国际投资仲裁机制改革的美欧制度之争

发布时间：2018-01-31 18:56

本文关键词： 国际投资仲裁北美自由贸易协定模式常设仲裁模式投资者主导东道国主导　出处：《环球法律评论》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：针对国际投资仲裁机制的缺陷,美国与欧盟在传统双边投资协定模式的基础上,分别以北美自由贸易协定模式与常设仲裁模式加以改革。两种模式在仲裁员由谁指定、上诉机制的设置以及仲裁庭的常设性和多边性等方面存在制度分歧。美欧的制度之争不仅反映了两者对国际投资仲裁机制改革应采取投资者主导型还是东道国主导型路径的不同认识,还反映了两者对国际投资仲裁制度主导权的争夺。对此,中国宜在多边路径下将国际投资仲裁机制纳入世界贸易组织争端解决机制,在区域路径下采纳北美自由贸易协定模式并加以适当调整。
[Abstract]:In view of the defects of the international investment arbitration mechanism, the United States and the European Union are based on the traditional bilateral investment agreement model. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) model and permanent arbitration model (NAFTA) have been reformed respectively. The two models are appointed by the arbitrators. There are institutional differences in the establishment of the appeal mechanism and the permanent and multilateral nature of the arbitral tribunal. The dispute between the United States and Europe not only reflects whether the reform of the international investment arbitration mechanism should be dominated by investors or host countries. Different understanding of the guided path. It also reflects the competition between the two parties for the dominance of the international investment arbitration system. Therefore, China should bring the international investment arbitration mechanism into the dispute settlement mechanism of the World Trade Organization under the multilateral path. Adopt the NAFTA model under the regional path and adjust it appropriately.
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学;
【基金】：2015年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“提高中国在全球经济治理中的制度性话语权研究”(15ZDC038)的研究成果
【分类号】：D996.4
【正文快照】： 国际投资仲裁机制自产生以来,为国际投资协定所广泛采纳,但在适用过程中也因过度保护投资者、挑战东道国公共政策及条约解释不一致等问题而备受争议。20世纪末至21世纪初,美国立足于投资者主导的国际投资仲裁机制,以《北美自由贸易协定》国际投资仲裁条款为基础,对仲裁程序的

【相似文献】