论“公民权利与政治权利国际公约”视野下的事实身份关系

发布时间：2018-02-01 05:28

本文关键词： 国际公约国际人权法事实身份关系法律身份关系　出处：《江西财经大学学报》2010年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：1998年中国政府签署了《公民权利与政治权利国际公约》,个人国际法主体资格成立的前提下,事实身份关系在该公约中为"家庭"而受保护,而国内司法解释为"同居关系",不受法律保护,以至于我国国际私法上的涉外事实身份关系法律冲突的解决,不可能有对应的同居关系的冲突规范适用。解读《公民权利与政治权利国际公约》有关条款的启示是:事实身份关系应建构为"事实婚姻"这一法律身份关系,从而使事实身份关系,在国内婚姻家庭法、国际法及国际私法上法律身份一致。
[Abstract]:In 1998, the Chinese Government signed the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights, and under the premise of the establishment of the subject qualification of individual international law, de facto identity relations are protected for the "family" in the Covenant. But the domestic judicial interpretation is "cohabitation relationship", which is not protected by law, so that the legal conflict of the foreign factual identity relationship in private international law in our country is resolved. It is impossible to apply the corresponding conflict norms of cohabitation relationship. The revelation of the interpretation of the relevant articles of the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights is that the de facto identity relationship should be constructed into the legal status relationship of "de facto marriage". Thus, the de facto identity relationship is consistent in domestic marriage and family law, international law and private international law.
【作者单位】：广州大学公法研究中心;
【分类号】：D99
【正文快照】： 当代基于个体充分意思自治建构的私人生活方式领域的身份关系,有法律身份关系与事实身份关系之别。①事实身份关系所具有的自然与社会属性不被我国国内婚姻家庭法律确认与保护,以至于成为长期困扰我国婚姻家庭理论与实践的重点、难点问题,但从国际人权法的视角分析,结论截然

【共引文献】