对仲裁案件中律师不当行为的处罚

发布时间：2018-02-02 02:51

本文关键词： 仲裁中对律师的处罚 IBA指导意见律师不当行为　出处：《外交学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：仲裁作为一种重要的争端解决方式,在《纽约公约》的促进下取得了重大成功。近些年来,仲裁案件数量显著增长,标的额也越来越大。在经济利益的驱使下大量人员进入仲裁领域就业。人员的涌入在促进行业发展的同时也造成了巨大的问题。如,代理律师执业能力及素质参差不齐,执业习惯因人而异。这些情况就导致仲裁领域中律师不当行为的发生越来越频繁。同时,在利益的驱使以及仲裁制度特点的掩护下,这种不当行为越来越多地成为一种实现己方利益最大化的手段,严重影响仲裁程序的顺畅进行,以及仲裁结果的客观公正。就这一问题,国际仲裁领域已经进行了相关学术讨论,并在实务领域中一定程度上引入了对律师的处罚制度。比如国际律师协会(International Bar Association以下简称“IBA”)的《IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration》(以下简称“指导意见”)以及伦敦国际仲裁院(The London Court of International Arbitration以下简称“LCIA”)2014年发布的仲裁规则。本文也将以上述两部文件为主要参考资料对律师的处罚制度加以分析。具体结构如下:第一部分:概括介绍对仲裁领域律师的不当行为处罚的学理发展。主要涉及的问题为律师的不当行为现状、成因,以及仲裁庭是否有权进行处罚。第二部分:以IBA的指导意见、LCIA 2014年的仲裁规则,以及各法学家的论文为蓝本,分析国际仲裁领域对律师不当行为处罚制度的实践。其中具体问题包括:应明确禁止的不当行为有哪些;可以采用的处罚方式;可以执行处罚的机构。第三部分:主要通过问卷调查的形式,收集我国仲裁领域从业人员对这一问题的看法和观点倾向,并通过理论分析,为完善我国仲裁领域相关制度构建提供建议。第四部分:结论及展望。再次强调仲裁案件中律师不当行为对仲裁案件审理程序及裁决结果的影响,并希望我国各仲裁机构可以完善仲裁规则从而在一定程度上缓解这一问题的负面影响。
[Abstract]:Arbitration as an important method of dispute settlement, promoted by the New York Convention, has achieved great success. In recent years, the number of arbitration cases has increased significantly. In the economic interests driven by a large number of people into the arbitration field of employment. The influx of personnel in promoting the development of the industry but also caused huge problems. The practice ability and quality of lawyers are not uniform, and the practice habits vary from person to person. These cases lead to more and more frequent misconduct of lawyers in the field of arbitration. At the same time. Driven by interests and covered by the characteristics of arbitration system, this kind of misconduct has become a means to maximize the interests of our own parties, seriously affecting the smooth conduct of arbitration procedures. And the objective and fair outcome of arbitration. On this issue, the field of international arbitration has been the relevant academic discussions. To some extent, the system of punishment for lawyers has been introduced in the field of practice. For example, the International Bar Association (. International Bar Association (hereinafter referred to as "IBA"). IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International. Arbitration > (. (hereinafter referred to as the "guidance opinion") and the London Court of International Arbitration (. The London Court of International Arbitration (hereinafter referred to as "LCIA"). The arbitration rules issued in 2014. This article will also use the above two documents as the main reference materials to analyze the system of punishment of lawyers. The specific structure is as follows: part I:. This paper briefly introduces the theoretical development of misconduct punishment of lawyers in the field of arbitration. The main problem involved is the current situation of lawyers' misconduct. The causes and whether the arbitral tribunal has the power to impose penalties. Part two: based on the guidance of the IBA, the arbitration rules of 2014, as well as the papers of the jurists as the model. This paper analyzes the practice of the system of punishment for lawyers' misconduct in the field of international arbitration. The specific problems include: what kind of misconduct should be prohibited; The form of punishment that can be adopted; The third part: mainly through the form of questionnaire, collect the opinions and opinion tendency of the practitioners in the arbitration field of our country, and through the theoretical analysis. In order to improve the construction of the relevant system in the field of arbitration in China, part 4th: conclusions and prospects. Again emphasize the impact of misconduct of lawyers in arbitration cases on the proceedings and the outcome of arbitration cases. It is hoped that the arbitration institutions in our country can perfect the arbitration rules so as to alleviate the negative effects of this problem to a certain extent.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】