区域贸易环境协调法律机制研究
发布时间:2018-02-06 01:44
本文关键词: 贸易自由化 环境保护 协调 区域性组织 中国—东盟自由贸易区 出处:《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:自由贸易与环境保护既有促进又存在冲突,,国际社会为了协调二者的关系进行了不懈的努力:WTO将环境问题和可持续发展纳入其主要工作之一,并主要利用争端解决机制来协调二者的冲突,但WTO贸易优先的价值取向限制了其协调的步伐;欧盟和北美自由贸易区在贸易与环境的协调上发展迅速,二者均已形成了协调的法律机制并取得了良好的协调效果。 新兴的中国—东盟自由贸易区在享受经贸利益的同时也遭遇了许多环境问题,加强区域内环境合作并构建贸易与环境协调的法律机制有利于促进自贸区的可持续发展。本文综合运用案例分析、比较分析等方法对相关问题进行了系统的研究,分为以下五个部分: 第一章从贸易与环境的相互促进和冲突入手,通过考察WTO对贸易与环境的协调和WTO与区域协调的关系,揭示出区域协调所具有的优势,最后以区域协调的最新发展来表现了这一优势。 第二章选取了区域协调中比较典型的欧盟和北美自由贸易区进行介绍,从贸易与环境协调的历史发展入手,总结了它们各自的协调原则,并通过比较分析揭示出了这些原则在适用上的差别所在。 第三章介绍了欧盟通过征收碳税、统一产品标准、签订自愿环境协议等措施和北美自由贸易区通过赋予多边环境协议(MEAs)优先适用地位、规定环境标准的等效承认等措施来协调贸易与环境的关系,并通过比较分析指出了这些规则的异同及优劣之处。 第四章阐述了欧盟强制性的司法争端解决模式和北美自由贸易区“协商+仲裁”的准司法争端解决模式,并通过对争端解决的程序及效果进行分析的揭示出一个适合的争端解决机制对一个区域性组织的重要意义所在。 第五章详细阐述了中国—东盟自由贸易区贸易与环境协调法律机制的构建。本章从自由贸易区贸易与环境协调的现状及最新进展入手,通过分析协调法律机制构建的可行性及不利条件,揭示出自贸区具备构建协调法律机制的条件,并就协调法律机制构建的内容进行了详细阐述。
[Abstract]:Free trade and environmental protection have both promotion and conflict. In order to coordinate the relationship between them, the international community has made unremitting efforts to integrate environmental issues and sustainable development into one of its main work. And mainly use the dispute settlement mechanism to coordinate the conflict between the two, but the value orientation of WTO trade priority limits its coordination step; The European Union and the North American Free Trade area have developed rapidly in the coordination of trade and environment, both of which have formed a coordinated legal mechanism and achieved a good coordination effect. The emerging China-ASEAN Free Trade area has encountered many environmental problems while enjoying the economic and trade benefits. Strengthening the regional environmental cooperation and constructing the legal mechanism of trade and environment coordination is beneficial to promote the sustainable development of the free trade area. The comparative analysis and other methods have carried on the systematic research to the related question, which is divided into the following five parts: The first chapter starts with the mutual promotion and conflict between trade and environment, and reveals the advantages of regional coordination by examining the coordination of trade and environment by WTO and the relationship between WTO and regional coordination. Finally, this advantage is demonstrated by the latest development of regional coordination. The second chapter introduces the typical European Union and North American Free Trade area in regional coordination, and summarizes their respective coordination principles from the historical development of trade and environment coordination. And through comparative analysis to reveal the differences in the application of these principles. The third chapter introduces the European Union through the collection of carbon taxes, unified product standards, signed voluntary environmental agreements and other measures and the North American Free Trade area through the granting of multilateral environmental agreements (Meas) priority status. The equivalent recognition of environmental standards is stipulated to coordinate the relationship between trade and environment, and the similarities and disadvantages of these rules are pointed out through comparative analysis. Chapter 4th expounds the compulsory judicial dispute settlement model of EU and the quasi-judicial dispute settlement model of "negotiated arbitration" in NAFTA. By analyzing the procedure and effect of dispute settlement, it reveals the importance of a suitable dispute settlement mechanism to a regional organization. Chapter 5th elaborates the construction of the legal mechanism of trade and environment coordination in China-ASEAN Free Trade area. This chapter starts with the current situation and the latest progress of the trade and environment coordination of the Free Trade area. By analyzing the feasibility and unfavorable conditions of the construction of the coordinated legal mechanism, this paper reveals that the trade zone has the conditions for constructing the coordinated legal mechanism, and expounds in detail the contents of the construction of the coordinated legal mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贺小勇;论WTO体制下资源保障措施的法律问题——以中欧焦炭贸易争端为分析视角[J];比较法研究;2004年05期
2 黄锡生,黄福辉;论WTO环境保护例外的适用[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2003年01期
3 张铁军;;中国与东亚共同体建构[J];东北亚论坛;2006年02期
4 王传丽;;欧洲法院的司法独立性对欧洲一体化进程的贡献[J];当代法学;2008年02期
5 陈志;;构建大湄公河次区域争端解决机制的思考——以区域贸易争端解决机制模式为鉴[J];东南亚纵横;2008年09期
6 孙志煜;;区域经贸争端解决的制度与实践——以中国—东盟自由贸易区为例[J];法学评论;2011年01期
7 蔡守秋;王欢欢;;欧盟环境法的发展历程与趋势[J];福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
8 张冕;;浅析环境合作机制中的司法保障[J];经济研究导刊;2011年19期
9 黄颖;;欧盟贸易环境政策对中国-东盟自由贸易区之启示[J];昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
10 宫辉;;“低碳风暴”下的航空运输业[J];空运商务;2009年23期
本文编号:1493281
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1493281.html