当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

中国企业境外矿业权投资协议的法律问题研究

发布时间:2018-02-25 02:28

  本文关键词: 中国矿业企业 矿业权 矿业权投资协议 出处:《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:中国进入了高速消费矿产原材料的时期,而国内资源储量已无法满足工业发展的需求,因此越来越多的中国矿业企业选择投资海外。基于矿产资源对国计民生的重要作用以及矿业权的特殊性,各个资源国对矿业权设置了不同程度的投资限制。资源所在国政府对矿产资源的经济主权是投资者的主要阻碍。投资方式主要分为两种:一种是矿业勘探开发投资,其目的是取得探矿权以及相应的采矿权;另一种是并购已取得矿业权的企业。发展中国家倾向于直接与矿业权投资者签订矿业权投资协议,以保证国家的经济利益;发达国家则倾向于限制外资的进入,保护本国矿业企业的垄断地位。这些限制主要体现在中国投资者与资源国政府、他国资源企业之间的矿业权投资协议之中。较之其他海外投资,矿业权投资的政治风险更大、投资审查也更为严格。本文以矿业权和矿业权投资协议为落脚点,对我国矿业企业的海外矿业权投资进行研究。 第一章概述了中国矿业权投资的基本情况和矿业权的内涵,矿业权的特殊属性使矿业权投资相比其他投资而言,有更严格的限制。资源所在国对自然资源的经济主权是国家控制矿业权投资的基石。第二章对矿业权投资协议进行了分类讨论。勘探投资协议的主体之一是资源国政府或其代表,标的为探矿权及与之对应的采矿权;矿业收购协议的标的是企业已经获得的采矿权。中国企业面对两种协议主体,所遭受的国家风险有所不同。同时,矿业权投资协议也是对矿业权收益分配的直接体现。第三章对我国国有矿业上市公司的法律属性进行了探讨。作为投资主力军的国有企业,与中国政府的关系不清晰,是导致投资在资源国遭受质疑的重要原因。第四章对矿业权投资协议中一些重要的条款加以分析;这些条款有别于其他投资,需要予以重视。这些条款涉及地探成果权的归属、矿区环境保护、稳定条款和重新谈判条款和土地使用权条款。第五章分析了矿业权投资协议的法律适用以及中国企业对投资协议的保护。在对以上条款讨论的基础上,,重视担保机构的信息评估并且在协议中增加相关利益方,进而减少矿业权投资的风险。
[Abstract]:China has entered a period of high-speed consumption of mineral raw materials, and domestic resources reserves can no longer meet the needs of industrial development. Therefore, more and more Chinese mining enterprises choose to invest overseas. Based on the important role of mineral resources to the national economy and people's livelihood and the particularity of mining rights, Various resource countries have set different investment restrictions on mining rights. The economic sovereignty of the governments of the countries where the resources are located is the main hindrance of investors. There are two main ways of investment: one is investment in mining exploration and development, and the other is investment in mining exploration and development. The purpose is to obtain the prospecting right and the corresponding mining right, the other is to acquire the enterprise which has acquired the mining right. The developing countries tend to sign the mining right investment agreement with the mining right investor directly in order to guarantee the national economic benefit. The developed countries tend to restrict the entry of foreign capital and protect the monopoly position of their mining enterprises. These restrictions are mainly reflected in Chinese investors and governments of resource countries. The political risk of mining right investment is greater than other overseas investment, and the investment review is more strict. This paper takes mining right and mining right investment agreement as the foothold. This paper studies the overseas mining right investment of Chinese mining enterprises. The first chapter summarizes the basic situation of mining right investment and the connotation of mining right in China. The special attribute of mining right makes mining right investment compare with other investment. There are more strict restrictions. The economic sovereignty of the country of resources over natural resources is the cornerstone of the state control of mining right investment. Chapter 2 discusses the mining right investment agreement classified. One of the main bodies of the exploration investment agreement is resources. Governments or their representatives, The subject matter is the prospecting right and the corresponding mining right; the object of the mining acquisition agreement is the mining right that the enterprise has already obtained. Chinese enterprises face different national risks in the face of the two kinds of agreements. At the same time, The third chapter discusses the legal attributes of the state-owned mining listed companies in China. As the main force of investment, the relationship between the state-owned enterprises and the Chinese government is not clear. Chapter 4th analyzes a number of important provisions in mining rights investment agreements, which are different from other investments and need to be taken seriously. Mining area environmental protection, stability clause, renegotiation clause and land use right clause. Chapter 5th analyzes the legal application of mining right investment agreement and the protection of investment agreement by Chinese enterprises. Attach importance to the information evaluation of the guarantee agency and add relevant stakeholders to the agreement, thereby reducing the risk of mining right investment.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996;F426.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 史建军;;我国企业海外投资的政治风险及规避[J];产业与科技论坛;2008年05期

2 刘夏荣,方小美;伊拉克石油工业对外合作模式[J];国际石油经济;2002年12期

3 余振国;论矿业权的物权属性及其法律完善[J];中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期

4 王淼;袁栋;;海洋矿产资源产权问题成因与对策[J];矿业研究与开发;2007年05期

5 崔建远,晓坤;矿业权基本问题探讨[J];法学研究;1998年04期

6 康纪田;;论建立产业管制型的现代矿业制度[J];企业活力;2007年06期

7 王保树;完善国有企业改革措施的法理念[J];中国法学;2000年02期

8 王世军;我国矿业问题的制度及其分析[J];中国矿业;2005年04期

9 杨俊鹏;周妍;孙爽;胡克;刘大为;;我国矿山土地复垦监测机制初探[J];中国矿业;2010年S1期

10 胡振琪,赵艳玲,毕银丽;美国矿区土地复垦[J];中国土地;2001年06期



本文编号:1532692

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1532692.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2c051***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com