国际海洋争端解决中的“司法造法”问题——以“南海仲裁案”为例

发布时间：2018-02-27 06:12

本文关键词： 司法造法南海仲裁案正当性国际法治海洋争端解决　出处：《当代法学》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作为国际司法裁判进程的"副产品",国际法上的"司法造法"问题因为国际争端解决的"司法化"趋势而日渐突出。在对国际法进行解释和适用的过程中,国际司法机构不时突破正常的司法职能,事实上修改或创设规则,从而对国际法的发展产生了实质性的影响。在"南海仲裁案"中,虽然国际仲裁庭在多个方面进行了大尺度的"造法"工作,但囿于正当性、公正性和政治化等方面的结构性缺陷,这一"造法"活动价值有限且有损国际法治。相关裁决不应成为国际法上可资援引的"先例"。
[Abstract]:As a "by-product" of the process of international judicial adjudication, the problem of "judicial law making" in international law is increasingly prominent because of the trend of "judicialization" of international dispute settlement. In the process of interpretation and application of international law, From time to time, international judicial organs break through their normal judicial functions and, in fact, modify or create rules, thus having a substantial impact on the development of international law... in the South China Sea Arbitration case, Although the international arbitral tribunal has carried out large-scale "law-making" work in many aspects, it is constrained by structural defects in terms of legitimacy, impartiality and politicization. This "law-making" activity is of limited value and undermines the international rule of law. The relevant decision should not constitute a "precedent" that can be invoked in international law.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“南海地区安全合作机制研究”(15JZD036) 国家社科基金一般项目“中韩海域划界中的国际法问题研究”(15BFX192)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】