《中国入世议定书》第15条到期的问题及解读

发布时间：2018-02-27 10:01

本文关键词： 《中国入世议定书》第条市场经济地位反倾销替代国特殊市场状况　出处：《中国政法大学学报》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《中国加入世界贸易组织议定书》(以下简称《中国入世议定书》)第15条已于2016年12月11日到期,引发关于中国是否能自动获认市场经济地位,以及是否能在反倾销确定正常价值时继续使用"替代国"做法的争议。笔者认为,市场经济地位与替代国做法并不存在必然联系。2016年之后,无论中国市场经济地位认定与否,《中国入世议定书》第15条a款都不能再视为适用替代国做法的法律依据。针对美欧坚持在第15条到期之后依然拒不放弃"替代国"做法,中国已将美欧诉诸WTO争端解决机制,以敦促WTO成员方履行其条约义务。本文拟就《中国入世议定书》第15条的到期及其解读,及可能出现的WTO进口成员国通过《反倾销协议》第2.2条中的"特殊市场状况"对中国产品适用替代国做法进行分析和论述。
[Abstract]:Article 15 of the Protocol on China's accession to the World Trade Organization (hereinafter referred to as the Protocol on China's accession to the WTO) expired on December 11th 2016, giving rise to questions as to whether China can automatically be recognized as a market economy. And whether we can continue to use the "surrogate country" approach in determining the normal value of anti-dumping. The author believes that the market economy status is not necessarily related to the surrogate country approach. No matter whether China's market economy status is recognized or not, Article 15a of the Protocol on China's accession to the WTO can no longer be regarded as the legal basis for the application of the surrogate country's practice. In view of the insistence of the United States and Europe on refusing to give up the "surrogate country" practice after the expiration of Article 15, China has applied the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to the United States and Europe in order to urge WTO members to fulfil their treaty obligations. This paper intends to discuss the expiration of Article 15 of the Protocol on China's accession to the WTO and its interpretation. And the possible WTO importing countries analyze and discuss the surrogate country practices of Chinese products through the "special market conditions" in Article 2.2 of the Anti-dumping Agreement.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学国际法学院;中国政法大学国际教育学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目:“应对国际贸易摩擦和争端的协调机制研究”(项目号:09AZD014)的子项目“应对国际贸易摩擦与争端协调机制比较研究”的后期成果
【分类号】：D996.1

【相似文献】