当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

跨国破产管辖权问题研究

发布时间:2018-03-01 03:11

  本文关键词: 跨国破产 管辖权确定 管辖权冲突 出处:《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:相对于20世纪80年代的跨国收购与兼并热而言,90年代出现并持续至今的跨国破产热引起了理论界和实务界更多的关注。跨国破产涉及的法律问题十分复杂,主要包括破产的管辖权、破产的法律适用、破产的域外效力、对外国破产的承认与协助、外国债权人的地位和待遇等问题。我国国内法学界对跨国破产研究起步较晚,且研究成果多侧重于破产域外效力的讨论,也有一些涉及到跨国破产的法律适用,但在管辖权问题方面鲜有触及。然而管辖权问题又是跨国破产领域诸多法律问题中的重中之重,管辖权对法律选择的决定性很大,一国法院的判决具有域外效力,并得到其他国家承认与执行的首要条件是审理案件的法院对案件具有管辖权。所以,本文拟对管辖权问题进行分析,并寻求解决管辖权冲突的合理途径。 论文结构分为三部分,主要围绕传统国际民商事管辖权理论在跨国破产中的适用、跨国破产管辖权冲突的成因分析及现存解决途径这三个方面来论述,最后对我国在跨国破产管辖权方面的问题展开法理思考与实证分析。 第一部分阐述了跨国破产管辖权理论与确定依据。首先,指出管辖权确定的重要意义。然后,探讨国际民商事管辖权在跨国破产领域的适用,划分以“属地”为基础的管辖原则和以“属人”为基础的管辖原则,分别就不同的管辖依据进行阐述说明与利弊分析。 第二部分从不同角度分析跨国破产管辖权冲突产生的原因。主要包括案件的国际性、当事人诉讼动机、各国立法差异以及各国司法态度等诸多因素。进而,对目前国际国内对跨国破产案件管辖权冲突的解决方法进行探究,梳理其基本规定,分析其优劣之处。 第三部分落脚到我国在跨国破产管辖权问题上的基本规定与基本态度。主要从我国在跨国破产管辖权问题上的立法现状与司法实践切入,剖析其暴露出的问题,从而为我国今后在跨国破产管辖权问题上提出立法建议。
[Abstract]:Compared with the transnational takeover and merger fever in 1980s, the transnational bankruptcy fever that appeared in the 1990s and continues to this day has attracted more attention in the theoretical and practical circles. The legal issues involved in transnational bankruptcy are very complex. It mainly includes the jurisdiction of bankruptcy, the application of bankruptcy law, the extraterritorial effect of bankruptcy, the recognition and assistance to foreign bankruptcy, the status and treatment of foreign creditors, and so on. Moreover, the research results focus on the discussion of the extraterritorial effects of bankruptcy, and some of them are related to the legal application of transnational bankruptcy. However, jurisdiction is one of the most important legal issues in the field of transnational bankruptcy. Jurisdiction is a decisive factor in the choice of law, and the judgments of a country's courts have extraterritorial effects. The first condition of recognition and enforcement in other countries is that the court hearing the case has jurisdiction over the case. Therefore, this paper intends to analyze the jurisdiction and seek a reasonable way to resolve the conflict of jurisdiction. The structure of the thesis is divided into three parts: the application of the traditional theory of international civil and commercial jurisdiction in transnational bankruptcy, the analysis of the causes of the conflict of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction and the existing solutions. At last, the author makes a legal thinking and empirical analysis on the transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction in China. The first part expounds the theory and determination basis of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction. Firstly, it points out the significance of jurisdiction determination. Then, it discusses the application of international civil and commercial jurisdiction in the field of transnational bankruptcy. This paper divides jurisdiction principle based on "territory" and jurisdiction principle based on "personality", and explains and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of different jurisdiction bases. The second part analyzes the causes of the conflict of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction from different angles. It mainly includes the internationality of the case, the motive of litigants, the legislative differences of countries and the judicial attitude of various countries. This paper probes into the methods of solving the jurisdiction conflict of transnational bankruptcy cases at home and abroad, combs its basic provisions and analyzes its advantages and disadvantages. The third part focuses on the basic regulations and attitudes of our country on transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction, mainly from the current legislative situation and judicial practice of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction in our country, and analyzes the problems exposed by it. In order to our country in the future on the issue of transnational bankruptcy jurisdiction to put forward legislative recommendations.
【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D997;D925.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 罗剑雯;论欧盟民商事管辖权体系对协调我国区际民商事管辖权冲突的启示[J];法学评论;2004年03期

2 朱景文;欧盟法对法律全球化的意义[J];法学;2001年12期

3 郭树理;国际民商事管辖权冲突及其救济——对中国实践的考察[J];法学;2000年07期

4 张宪初;内地与香港民商事案件管辖权冲突刍议[J];法律适用;2004年09期

5 高江南;现代国际法与国际民商事诉讼管辖权冲突的解决[J];法律适用;2003年11期

6 黄进;邹国勇;;欧盟民商事管辖权规则的嬗变——从《布鲁塞尔公约》到《布鲁塞尔条例》[J];东岳论丛;2006年05期

7 王淑敏,王秀芬;论国际民商事诉讼管辖权的消极冲突[J];当代法学;2004年06期

8 林锐鑫,陈晓广;浅析英国民商事管辖权制度[J];河北法学;2003年01期

9 王霖华;国际民事诉讼中的协议管辖问题研究[J];河北法学;2002年02期

10 郭树理;欧盟统一国际破产法运动的最新进展[J];欧洲;2001年04期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 钱锋;论外国法院民商事判决的承认与执行[D];对外经济贸易大学;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 孙端阳;论跨国破产的域外效力[D];大连海事大学;2008年

2 于文娟;跨国破产管辖权冲突及其解决途径[D];中国政法大学;2007年

3 周芬;论国际私法上意思自治原则的扩展[D];湖南大学;2007年

4 蔺旭;跨国银行破产国际协作法律问题研究[D];湖南大学;2007年

5 于海龙;破产的域外效力问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2006年

6 黄诚;论跨国破产的域外效力[D];中国海洋大学;2006年



本文编号:1550134

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1550134.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户30549***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com