二手数字出版物与发行权用

发布时间：2018-03-01 18:07

本文关键词： 二手数字出版物发行权信息网络传播权发行权用尽　出处：《出版发行研究》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：数字出版物二手市场方兴未艾。其合法与否,取决于法律是否承认"网络发行"与"发行权用尽"。对此,我国既无法律规定,也无司法判例。 2012年,欧美法院先后审理二手数字出版物在线交易纠纷,均承认数字出版物经过网络合法地发行后,发行权可以用尽。但是,美国法院以复制权为基础,限制发行权用尽;而欧盟以合法转售为基础,从宽适用发行权用尽。我国著作权制度整体近似欧盟,法院很可能基于欧盟法院的法律推理,认可二手数字出版物在线市场合法。鉴于二手与一手数字出版物品质无异,二手数字出版物在线市场可强烈冲击数字出版业,应借第三次著作权法修改之际,由人大综合衡量各方利益,明确网络发行之数字出版物是否准用发行权用尽。
[Abstract]:The secondary market for digital publications is in the ascendant. Whether it is legal or not depends on whether the law recognizes "network distribution" and "the exhaustion of distribution rights." in this regard, there are neither legal provisions nor judicial precedents in our country. 2012, European and American courts have tried disputes over online transactions of second-hand digital publications, admitting that after digital publications are legally distributed through the network, the distribution rights can be exhausted. However, American courts restrict the exhaustion of distribution rights on the basis of reproduction rights; On the basis of legal resale, the EU applies leniently to the exhaustion of distribution rights. China's copyright system as a whole is similar to that of the EU, and the courts are likely to base on the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice. Recognizing that the online market for second-hand digital publications is legal. In view of the fact that the quality of used and primary digital publications is no different, the online market for second-hand digital publications can have a strong impact on the digital publishing industry and should be amended by the third copyright Law. By the National people's Congress to assess the interests of all parties, to determine whether the network issued digital publications can use up the right to issue.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：浙江大学光华法学院 985 项目经费资助
【分类号】：D971.2;D99;D923.41

【参考文献】