欧盟对待域外经济制裁的政策转变及其背景分析

发布时间：2018-03-02 18:42

本文选题：欧盟　切入点：经济制裁　出处：《德国研究》2012年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：二战后,美国经常采用域外经济制裁以实现其外交政策目标。美国的域外经济制裁不仅针对受制裁国,而且还对第三国与受制裁国之间的经济交往进行限制,这违背了欧洲国家在传统上所坚持的国际法基本原则。欧共体和后来的欧盟出于自身外交政策的考虑,对美国的域外经济制裁进行了全方面抵制。1980年代的苏联天然气管道案和1990年代的《赫尔姆斯-伯顿法》事件是欧美之间围绕域外经济制裁问题彼此矛盾的总爆发。进入21世纪之后,随着欧盟一体化进程的加速发展,尤其是在《里斯本条约》生效之后,欧盟逐渐形成了统一的外交政策,开始转变其对待域外经济制裁的态度。2010年美国颁布的对伊朗制裁法虽然继续保留了域外管辖权条款,但欧盟不仅未加反对,反而颁布了与其相一致的对伊朗制裁条例。欧盟对待域外经济制裁的政策转变对传统国际法将产生深远影响。
[Abstract]:After World War II, the United States often used extraterritorial economic sanctions to achieve its foreign policy objectives. This runs counter to the fundamental principles of international law that European countries have traditionally adhered to. The European Community and later the European Union, for reasons of their own foreign policy, The Soviet Union Gas Pipeline case in the 1980s and the Helms-Burton Act incident in the 1990s was a total outbreak of contradictions between the United States and the United States over the issue of extraterritorial economic sanctions. After 21th century, With the accelerated development of the EU integration process, especially after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the EU gradually formed a unified foreign policy. Began to change its attitude towards extraterritorial economic sanctions. Although the United States sanctions Act against Iran of 2010 continued to retain extraterritorial jurisdiction provisions, the European Union did not oppose it. The EU's policy shift towards extraterritorial economic sanctions will have a profound impact on traditional international law.
【作者单位】：复旦大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“经济全球化与美国对外经济制裁法律问题研究”(项目编号:08BFX054)的研究成果之一
【分类号】：D996.1

【相似文献】