确立国家刑事责任的争议及其价值分析

发布时间：2018-03-04 01:15

本文选题：国家刑事责任　切入点：国际犯罪　出处：《湖南师范大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：国家责任是国际法早已确立的一项重要原则,但国家刑事责任至今尚未在国际法律法规中出现,也没有在国际刑法界形成共识,国际刑事审判实践中亦未出现过追究国家的国际犯罪刑事责任的实例。但是法律具有实然性和应然性两种评判标准,实然性的缺失并不能否认应然性的价值,现阶段对国家刑事责任的豁免,并不能妨碍我们探讨确立国家刑事责任的价值,而且从国际社会实践来看,确立国家刑事责任已迫在眉睫。刑事责任是犯罪所产生的法律后果,任何犯罪主体实施了犯罪行为就应当承担相应的法律后果。国家作为国际法的主体,其实施的国际犯罪活动亦应受到相应的国际刑事法律责难。本文根据国家刑事责任问题的产生和发展,分析了诸多学者针对国家刑事责任问题所产生的理论争议,并立足于刑法的精神和原理,着眼于国际社会实践,对确立国家刑事责任的价值做一个综合的探析。本文分为：引言：从2010年朝韩两国局部武装战争引发国际刑事法院进行战争罪行调查这一国际性事件引出国际法上争论的几个焦点问题,点出本文的创作意图和理论价值。第一章：阐述国家刑事责任问题的概说,以明确国家刑事责任的概念、特征、由来和发展。第二章：研究国家刑事责任问题的理论争议,通过分析比较两种对立的观点,阐述确立国家刑事责任的理论依据和理论价值。第三章：结合国际上实际,进一步详细论述确立国家刑事责任在维护国际社会秩序、捍卫人类和平安宁、保护世界自然环境以及预防国家违法犯罪方面的现实价值。结语：对全文做一个大致的总结,并展望确立国家刑事责任的理论前景。
[Abstract]:State responsibility is an important principle which has long been established in international law. However, the criminal responsibility of States has not yet appeared in international laws and regulations, nor has it formed a consensus in the international criminal law community. In the practice of international criminal trial, there have been no examples of investigating the criminal responsibility of a country for an international crime. However, the law has two kinds of judging standards, that is, materiality and necessity, and the lack of materiality cannot deny the value of due nature. The immunity from state criminal responsibility at the present stage can not prevent us from discussing the value of establishing state criminal responsibility, and from the practice of international society, it is urgent to establish state criminal responsibility. Criminal liability is the legal consequence of crime. Any criminal subject who commits a crime should bear the corresponding legal consequences. The state is the subject of international law. According to the emergence and development of the problem of national criminal responsibility, this paper analyzes the theoretical disputes of many scholars on the problem of national criminal responsibility. Based on the spirit and principle of criminal law and focusing on the practice of international society, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis on the value of establishing national criminal responsibility. This article is divided into:. Introduction: from 2010, the international incident of the International Criminal Court to investigate the war crimes caused by the partial armed war between the two countries leads to several controversial issues in international law, and points out the creative intention and theoretical value of this paper. Chapter one: to clarify the concept, characteristics, origin and development of state criminal responsibility. The second chapter studies the theory dispute of the national criminal responsibility, through analyzing and comparing the two opposing viewpoints, expounds the theoretical basis and the theoretical value of establishing the state criminal responsibility. Chapter three: combined with the international reality, the paper further discusses in detail the practical value of establishing national criminal responsibility in maintaining the international social order, safeguarding the peace and tranquility of mankind, protecting the natural environment of the world and preventing the state from breaking the law and committing crimes. Conclusion: a general summary of the full text, and prospects for the establishment of national criminal responsibility theory prospects.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.9

【参考文献】