论区际法律冲突下的公共秩序保留制度

发布时间：2018-03-04 19:46

本文选题：区际私法　切入点：公共秩序　出处：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：公共秩序是一个笼统的概念，我国学术上公共秩序多用在国际私法的公共秩序保留制度中。在我国拥有四个不同的法域，各自行使着自己的立法权、司法权。其中存在着区际公共秩序保留制度。本文分四部分介绍了区际公共秩序保留制度，并且介绍了世界一些代表性的国家、地域的公共秩序保留制度，再研究了我国的情况，并且对我国的区际公共秩序保留制度提出了建议。第一部分介绍了区际公共秩序保留制度。首先介绍了公共秩序制度的内容，各个分类。然后介绍了区际公共秩序保留制度的内容、本质及作用、以及确立该制度的意义，并与公共秩序保留制度在适用范围等方面进行对比。第二部分分别介绍了多法域国家美国、英国以及欧盟内的公共秩序保留制度的情况。首先，介绍了美国形成多法域的历史、法律原因；并且介绍了美国公共秩序保留制度的发展，以及重要的判例法。再次，介绍了区际公共秩序保留制度在英国的各法域的情况，英国不区分区际公共秩序与国际公共秩序。并且说明学术与实践对待区际公共秩序保留制度与国际公共秩序保留制度的不同。最后，，介绍了新兴的欧盟组织的公共秩序保留制度，在这部分，介绍了公共秩序保留制度的法律来由；干预的方法和内容；公共政策与公共秩序的对比研究；说明欧盟国际私法公共政策存在的问题；欧盟与公共政策相关的判决。第三部分介绍了我国区际公共秩序保留制度的研究意义，考虑我国各法域不同社会制度、不同法域、法律层级等说明我国区际公共秩序保留制度相比其他多法域国家的特点；之后分别详细地介绍大陆、香港、澳门、台湾立法、司法情况，举出大量具体、详细的区际公共秩序保留立法法条以及法院的判决。第四部分根据上述介绍分析，对比各国做法，考虑本国特殊情况，对于我国区际公共秩序保留制度分立法与司法各自提出完善建议。立法上可以统一“公共秩序”用语，规定公共秩序保留制度内涵、统一用“客观说”、规定排除违反公共秩序法律之后的法律适用等。司法上具体案件适用“客观说”，不搞地方保护主义，不唯地方利益至上。整篇论文对于区际私法公共秩序保留的系统介绍分析希望能对我国各法域之间的公共秩序保留制度做出一定的促进作用。
[Abstract]:Public order is a general concept. In our country, the academic public order is mostly used in the public order reservation system of private international law. In our country, there are four different jurisdictions, each exercising its own legislative power. Judicial power. Among them, there is an inter-regional public order reservation system. This paper introduces the inter-regional public order reservation system in four parts, and introduces the public order reservation system of some representative countries and regions in the world. The paper also studies the situation of our country, and puts forward some suggestions on the reservation system of interregional public order in our country. The first part introduces the reservation system of inter-regional public order. Firstly, it introduces the content and classification of the system of public order. Then it introduces the content, essence and function of the system of inter-regional public order reservation, as well as the significance of establishing the system. And compared with the public order reservation system in the scope of application and so on. The second part introduces the reservation system of public order in the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union respectively. Firstly, it introduces the history and legal reasons of the formation of multi-jurisdiction in the United States. It also introduces the development of the public order reservation system in the United States, as well as the important case law. Thirdly, it introduces the situation of the inter-regional public order reservation system in various jurisdictions of the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom does not distinguish between interregional public order and international public order. It also shows the difference between academic and practical treatment of the reservation system of interregional public order and that of international public order. In this part, the author introduces the legal reasons of the public order reservation system, the methods and contents of intervention, the comparative study of public policy and public order. This paper explains the problems existing in the public policy of EU private international law and the judgments related to public policy in the EU. The third part introduces the significance of the research on the reservation system of the inter-regional public order in China, considering the different social systems, different jurisdictions and legal levels in different legal regions of our country to explain the characteristics of the reservation system of the inter-regional public order in our country compared with other multi-jurisdiction countries. After that, they introduced in detail the legislation and judicial situation of the mainland, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and cited a large number of specific, detailed interregional public order retention legislative law articles and court decisions. The 4th part, according to the above introduction and analysis, contrasts the practice of various countries, considers the special situation of our country, and puts forward the perfect suggestion to our country's inter-regional public order reservation system by legislation and judicature, which can unify the term "public order" in legislation. It stipulates the connotation of public order reservation system, unified use of "objective theory", and the application of law after excluding violation of public order law, etc. In judicature, specific cases apply "objective theory" and do not engage in local protectionism, and do not respect local interests first. The whole paper introduces the system of the reservation of public order of private law in the region and hopes to promote the reservation system of public order among different jurisdictions of our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.1

【参考文献】