当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

欧盟《在线货物买卖法指令》法律问题研究

发布时间:2018-03-05 10:35

  本文选题:欧盟法 切入点:在线货物买卖法指令 出处:《大连海事大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:欧盟作为全球最具代表性的区域一体化国际组织,长期以来致力于实现更进一步的内部市场一体化进程。但在实践中,通常面临不同国家地区之间不同法律规范所带来的交易规则之差异,这亦是长期以来制约欧盟地区单一市场形成的主要原因。2015年12月,欧盟委员会为取代夭折的《欧盟统一销售法草案》,针对性的提出了适用于远程货物交易领域的《在线货物买卖法指令》草案,踏出了欧盟单一数字市场建设过程中的重要一步。本文通过对该指令所涉及的立法背景、适用方式及调整方法、瑕疵担保制度优化以及在线纠纷解决制度等问题的研究,探索其规则制度,尝试对我国相关法律制度的优化调整提供理论参考建议。本文由引言,正文,结论组成。正文共分为四章:第一章为欧盟及《在线货物买卖法指令》草案概述,主要是对欧盟及《指令》的背景进行介绍,包括欧盟及其立法现状、欧盟单一数字市场之愿景以及《指令》之前身《欧盟统一销售法草案》的相关内容,并就《指令》的框架内容作了概括性介绍。第二章为《在线货物买卖法指令》的适用方式及调整范围,《指令》较为罕见的采取了完全一致之标准,即要求成员国转化国内法必须完全一致,既不允许成员国规定过严,也不允许规定过宽的转化规定。另一方面,《指令》将调整范围限定于B2C领域的跨境远程货物交易范畴内,相对具体狭窄的调整范围使得其内容更具针对性,我国《电子商务法》草案在调整范围方面亦可从中借鉴有价值的制度规则。第三章为《在线货物买卖法指令》瑕疵担保制度研究,进一步就《指令》所针对的瑕疵担保制度进行了阐释分析,集中针对《指令》在瑕疵担保制度上的创新点及具备讨论价值的部分进行了研究,并从《指令》出发对我国瑕疵担保制度的重构进行了思考。第四章为《在线货物买卖法指令》之纠纷解决机制研究,主要探讨了在《指令》框架下的ODR纠纷解决机制的必要性可行性并对其适用进行了阐释,进一步探讨在我国ODR纠纷解决机制的架构过程中可以从中汲取的先进经验。
[Abstract]:The regional integration of international organizations as the most representative of the world, has long been committed to achieve further integration of the internal market process. But in practice, usually face the differences arising from different legal norms of the trading rules between different countries and regions, it is also the main reason of restricting.2015 for a long time the EU single market formed by the year in December, the European Commission to replace an EU uniform sales law > < draft, put forward the application in the field of remote goods transactions online sale of Goods Act > < draft directive, an important step in the process of stepping out of the EU single market digital construction. Through the legislative background involved in the instruction, application the way and methods of adjustment, study and solve the problem such as the system guarantee system flaw optimization and online dispute, explore its rules and regulations, tried on the related law of China law system To provide a theoretical reference suggestion of adjustment and optimization. This paper consists of introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is the European Union and the online sale of Goods Act > < instruction draft outline, mainly carries on the introduction to the European Union and the "Instruction > background, including the European Union and its legislative status, the related content of the EU single digital market the vision and the instruction of EU < < > formerly unified sales law >, and < > the command frame content and made a general introduction. The second chapter is applicable law > < instruction online for the sale of goods and the adjustment range, < > directive rare take standard completely consistent, which requires members in the transformation of domestic law must be completely consistent, not only does not allow member states too strict, also does not allow the provisions of conversion provisions wide. On the other hand, < > instruction will be adjusted to limit the scope of the field of cross-border transactions in goods B2C remote areas with relatively The adjustment range of body narrow make its contents more targeted, China's e-commerce law draft in < > the adjustment range can learn from the valuable rules. The third chapter is the "online sale of goods research method instruction > warranty system, explains the analysis further instructions for < > flaw the guarantee system, focus on" instruction > in warranty system on innovation and has discussed the value on the part of the study, and from the instruction of < > reconstruction of our warranty system of thinking. The fourth chapter is the method of online instruction < > dispute settlement mechanism of the sale of goods, the necessity of solving the main mechanism discussed in the < > instruction under the framework of ODR disputes and explains its application, to further explore the advanced experience of solving mechanism in the ODR dispute in our country in the process of architecture can learn from.

【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D996.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 吴志忠;试析英国货物买卖法之改进[J];中南财经大学学报;2000年03期

2 ;国际货物买卖法概述[J];国际化工信息;2005年08期

3 洪德;;英美的货物买卖法[J];政治与法律;1985年06期

4 王卫国;瑞典新《货物买卖法》的主要特点[J];比较法研究;1992年Z1期

5 沈禹钧;英国货物买卖法义务条款分类界定的最新发展[J];审计与经济研究;2000年03期

6 潘华仿;英国货物买卖法概说[J];比较法研究;1990年04期

7 徐国建;联合国国际货物销售合同公约的国际统一适用──评马格努斯的《联合国国际货物买卖法释义》一书[J];外国法译评;1995年04期

8 叶强;;从“买方谨慎”到“卖方谨慎”——谈英国货物买卖法下的默示条款[J];国际商法论丛;2004年00期

9 克里斯廷·A·罗伊斯—路易斯;梁慧星;;英国关于消费者安全的法律[J];环球法律评论;1990年04期

10 吴冠雄;英国货物买卖法的新发展——评介《1994年货物销售和提供法》[J];中外法学;1999年01期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 陆斯嘉;英国经验:法规保护与行业自律[N];东方早报;2013年

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 张行健;欧盟《在线货物买卖法指令》法律问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2017年

2 杨冬玲;国际货物买卖法和国际海上货物运输法的协同研究[D];大连海事大学;2005年



本文编号:1569877

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1569877.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b973e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com