南海争端和平解决的路径冲突及其化解——以国家主权的双重属性为框架

发布时间：2018-03-05 12:46

本文选题：南海争端　切入点：国家主权　出处：《政法论丛》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："南海仲裁案"暂告结束,南海争端问题表面上似乎趋于平息,但该争端所隐含的矛盾随时可能因为国际局势的变化而重新激化。中菲南海争端的基本事实表明,各国在争端解决路径上表现出的冲突从根本上源自双方对于国家主权属性的不同解读:同样从国家主权原则出发,若以其权力属性为本则倾向于选择外交方法,若以其权利属性为本则倾向于选择司法方法。从短期利益看来,中国以维护其合法权益为目的采取外交方法解决南海争端的策略具有相当的合理性。但从长期利益考虑,中国要想在大国政治和国际法的互动中和平地解决国际争端,则可以在坚持外交方法解决争端的实践传统上重视司法方法的规则构建功能,在利用司法方法解决争端的同时参与到国际法律秩序的构建之中。
[Abstract]:The "South China Sea Arbitration case" has come to an end, and the South China Sea dispute appears to be on the surface tending to appease, but the contradictions implied in the dispute may be re-intensified at any time by the changes in the international situation. The basic facts of the dispute between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea show that. The conflict in the dispute settlement path is fundamentally derived from the different interpretations of the attributes of state sovereignty by both parties: the same starting from the principle of state sovereignty, if based on their power attributes, they tend to choose diplomatic methods. In the short term, it is reasonable for China to adopt a diplomatic approach to resolve disputes in the South China Sea in order to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests, but from the long-term interest perspective, it is reasonable to adopt a diplomatic approach to resolve disputes in the South China Sea. If China wants to resolve international disputes peacefully in the interaction between great power politics and international law, it can attach importance to the rule building function of judicial method in the practice of insisting on diplomatic method to settle disputes. In the use of judicial methods to resolve disputes at the same time participate in the construction of the international legal order.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“南海地区安全合作机制研究”(项目批准号:15JZD036)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】