我国应对反倾销问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-08 09:14

本文选题：反倾销　切入点：世界贸易组织　出处：《郑州大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：经济全球化使国际贸易领域的竞争不断加剧,中国作为一个新兴的贸易大国,早已成为世界贸易摩擦的主战场。从1995-2009年,我国已经连续15年位居世界反倾销之首。随着中国贸易大国地位的确立,越来越多的国家利用反倾销,限制我国产品的输入,对我国的出口产业造成了重大的损失,阻碍了我国对外贸易快速、健康的发展。本文从我国遭受反倾销的现状入手,利用大量数据分析造成这种结果的原因,给我国造成的损害,结合我国在反倾销实践中的案例,最终总结出应对措施。我国出口市场单一,出口产品的价格低廉,容易给进口国造成倾销的印象。加上我国出口结构不合理,产品附加值低,更有无良商人恶意低价竞争,越来越多的国家对我国商品进行反倾销调查。在外国的反倾销调查中,欧盟、美国等西方发达国家将我国定位为“非市场经济国家”,使用“替代国”计算我国的倾销幅度,这是对我国贸易歧视的做法。我国政府应该利用我国在世界贸易组织的影响力,尽快取得“市场经济地位”,调整经济结构,鼓励企业发展技术含量高的产业。为了更好的应对反倾销,我国政府部门、行业协会和企业应该共同合作,建立反倾销预警机制,对重点国家、重点产品进行跟踪调查；设立反倾销应诉基金,为应诉企业消除顾虑,主动的应对国外对我国的反倾销投诉。能否建立起完善的反倾销法律体系是我国从根本上解决反倾销问题的关键所在,虽然早在1994年我国《对外贸易法》就将反倾销纳入了法律体系,但是和西方发达国家相比,我国反倾销法律的规定不够详尽,可操作性也比较差。笔者将我国《反倾销条例》和世界贸易组织的《反倾销协议》作比较,指出我国法律实体和程序方面的不足,并就我国反倾销法律的修订给出了建议。
[Abstract]:Economic globalization has intensified competition in the field of international trade. As a new trading power, China has long been the main battleground of world trade friction.From 1995-2009, China has been the first anti-dumping country in the world for 15 years in a row. With the establishment of China's status as a trading power, more and more countries have made use of anti-dumping to restrict the import of Chinese products, which has caused great losses to China's export industry. It hinders the rapid and healthy development of China's foreign trade. Starting with the current situation of anti-dumping in China, this paper analyzes the causes of this result by using a large number of data, and the damage caused to our country, combining with the cases in the practice of anti-dumping in China. Finally summed up the response measures. China's export market is single, and the price of its export products is low, which easily creates the impression of dumping in the importing countries. In addition, China's export structure is unreasonable, the added value of products is low, and there are even more unscrupulous businessmen who compete for low prices with malicious intent. More and more countries are conducting anti-dumping investigations on Chinese commodities. In foreign anti-dumping investigations, the European Union, the United States and other western developed countries have positioned China as a "non-market economy country" and used "surrogate countries" to calculate the dumping margin of our country. This is a practice of discriminating against China's trade. Our government should make use of our influence in the World Trade Organization to get "market economy status" as soon as possible and readjust the economic structure. To encourage enterprises to develop high-technology industries. In order to better deal with anti-dumping, our government departments, trade associations and enterprises should work together to establish an anti-dumping early warning mechanism to track and investigate key countries and key products. To set up the anti-dumping response fund, to eliminate the concerns of the responding enterprises, and to deal with the anti-dumping complaints from foreign countries. Whether or not we can establish a perfect anti-dumping legal system is the key to solve the anti-dumping problem fundamentally in our country. Although as early as 1994, our country's Foreign Trade Law brought anti-dumping into the legal system, but compared with the western developed countries, The provisions of antidumping laws in our country are not detailed enough, and their maneuverability is also relatively poor. The author compares China's Anti-dumping regulations with the World Trade Organization's Anti-dumping Agreement, and points out the deficiencies in our country's legal entities and procedures. Suggestions on the revision of anti-dumping laws in China are also given.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1;D922.29;F752.02

【参考文献】