国际犯罪构成论体系研究

发布时间：2018-03-11 00:35

本文选题：国际犯罪论体系　切入点：国际犯罪构成论体系　出处：《哈尔滨工业大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“国际犯罪论体系”是关于国际犯罪成立与形态的知识体系,“国际犯罪构成论体系”是关于国际犯罪成立的知识体系,后者是前者的核心与基础。刑法学的“犯罪论体系”,特别是“犯罪构成论体系”之争只能提供国际体系思考的知识论基础,但不能也不应直接进行国际转化。本文通过对“国际犯罪论体系”,特别是“国际犯罪构成论体系”进行学术发现、科学实证和学理提炼,以期实现学科互动,为体系之争提供全新视阈、输送可靠养分。本文采用整合研究的方法。首先,通过对国内外颇具代表性的国际刑法学理论著作进行学理考察发现,与之相关的命题付之阙如,且各种学说各自为政、混乱无序,其中较为有代表性的国外体系虽有合理基础,但设计不尽完善,国内体系接近国际实践,但基本问题尚不清晰、固定、合理,均很难发现学理层次较高的通说。于是,本文进一步对国际刑事法庭的规范进行规范考察发现,国际规范没有明显法系倾向,不等于、不能自动展示、也不能决定学理体系,而只能提供国际体系思考的法定要素。由此,发现国际活法模型并进行国际规范审视与学理比对,才是设计特定科学体系的可靠路径。最后,本文对国际刑事法院、前南斯拉夫刑事法庭、塞拉利昂特设法庭的经典裁决进行实证考察并进行体系建构。通过整合研究本文得出结论:“国际犯罪构成论体系”具有复合型和交错性,这是国际司法的“特定问题”决定了“特定体系”,不具有法系倾向性。本文的创新之处在于主要是运用“判例分析法”对“国际活法体系”进行科学实证而得出结论,可以为学理升华及日后的进一步深入研究奠定坚实的“司法理性”基础。
[Abstract]:The "international crime theory system" is the knowledge system concerning the establishment and form of international crime, and the "international crime constitution system" is the knowledge system about the establishment of international crime. The latter is the core and foundation of the former. However, we cannot and should not directly carry out international transformation. Through the academic discovery of the "international crime theory system", especially the "international crime constitution theory system", the scientific demonstration and scientific theory can be refined in order to realize the subject interaction. It provides a new visual threshold for the system debate and conveys reliable nutrients. This paper adopts the method of integrated research. First of all, through the theoretical investigation of the representative works of international criminal law at home and abroad, it is found that the related propositions are absent, and all kinds of theories are in their own right, chaotic and disorderly. Although the representative foreign system has a reasonable foundation, but its design is not perfect, the domestic system is close to international practice, but the basic problems are not clear, fixed and reasonable, and it is difficult to find a general theory with a higher academic level. This paper further studies the norms of the International Criminal Court and finds that the international norms have no obvious tendency of legal system, which does not mean that they cannot be displayed automatically, nor can they determine the theoretical system. It can only provide the legal elements of international system thinking. Thus, it is the reliable way to design a specific scientific system to discover the model of international living law and carry out the international normative review and theoretical comparison. Finally, this paper deals with the International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Criminal Court (ICC), and the International Criminal Court (ICC). The classic judgments of the Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the Ad Hoc Court for Sierra Leone are empirically investigated and systemically constructed. This is the "specific problem" of international justice, which determines the "specific system" and does not have the tendency of legal system. The innovation of this paper lies in the scientific and empirical conclusion of "international living law system" by using case analysis method, which can lay a solid foundation of "judicial rationality" for academic sublimation and further research in the future.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.9

【参考文献】