冲突与协调:国际刑法中的罪刑法定主义解读

发布时间：2018-03-17 14:01

本文选题：国际刑法　切入点：罪刑法定主义　出处：《学术交流》2010年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：罪刑法定虽然在不同的法系有不同的表现,但保障人权的基本价值诉求是一致的。国际刑法也以人权保障为己任,因而必然要求罪刑法定。但是,二战之后的国际军事法庭针对战犯的审判中,罪刑法定主义中的禁止事后法原则对审判的合法性提出了巨大的挑战。虽然此后的国际刑法对该原则都予以了明确的规定,但作为国际刑法重要渊源的国际习惯的适用可能会与禁止事后法原则存在冲突。此外,两大法系就罪刑法定主义中的明确性的要求在国际刑法中也没能得到充分的实现。罪刑法定主义不仅是法谚,更是一种人权保障的观念。在侵犯人类基本人权的最严重的犯罪面前,国际刑法不应该排除"自然法"作为其效力根据,从而使其与罪刑法定主义的基本要求相协调。
[Abstract]:Although there are different manifestations in different legal systems, the basic value demands of protecting human rights are the same. The international criminal law also takes human rights protection as its own duty, so it is necessary to require the legality of crime. In the trial of war criminals in the international military court after World War II, the principle of the prohibition of ex post facto in the doctrine of legality of the crime of a crime has posed a great challenge to the legality of the trial, although the international criminal law since then has clearly stipulated this principle. However, the application of international custom as an important source of international criminal law may conflict with the principle of prohibition of ex post facto law... in addition, The requirement of clarity in the doctrine of legality in the two legal systems has not been fully realized in international criminal law. In the face of the most serious crime of violating the basic human rights of human beings, the international criminal law should not exclude "natural law" as the basis for its validity, so as to harmonize it with the basic requirements of the doctrine of legality of a crime.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【分类号】：D997.9

【共引文献】