美俄入叙军事打击“伊斯兰国”——法律依据差异及其背后的话语权之争

发布时间：2018-03-17 15:17

本文选题：“伊斯兰国”　切入点：使用武力　出处：《国际观察》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："伊斯兰国"的崛起对国际和平与安全构成重大威胁,同时也威胁着美国及俄罗斯等国的利益。2014年8月,以美国为首的联盟开始对伊拉克境内的"伊斯兰国"展开军事打击,同年9月底又把军事打击范围扩展到叙利亚境内。一年后,俄罗斯也派军队进入叙利亚打击"伊斯兰国"。美国为其入叙打击"伊斯兰国"所给出的法律依据是:保卫伊拉克的集体自卫行动的延伸;叙利亚政府无意愿或无能力有效打击"伊斯兰国"。俄罗斯为其入叙打击"伊斯兰国"所给出的法律依据是:受到叙利亚政府的邀请;打击目标仅限于恐怖组织。同为入叙打击"伊斯兰国",美俄却选择了不同法律依据,其重要原因是两国围绕"叙利亚巴沙尔·阿萨德政府是否是合法政府"而进行着国际话语权之争。这种话语权之争从根本上讲是"何谓合法政府"这一国际规范层面问题之争的外在表现,其事关中国战略利益,值得中国密切关注。
[Abstract]:The rise of the Islamic State poses a major threat to international peace and security, as well as to the interests of the United States and Russia. On August 2014, the U.S.-led coalition launched a military strike against the Islamic State in Iraq. At the end of September of the same year, the scope of the military strike was extended to Syrian territory. One year later, Russia also sent troops into Syria to fight the Islamic State. The legal basis given by the United States for its entry into Syria against the Islamic State is: the extension of the collective self-defence action to defend Iraq; The Syrian Government has no will or capacity to effectively combat the Islamic State. Russia's legal basis for its entry into Syria against the Islamic State is: at the invitation of the Syrian Government; The targets are limited to terrorist organizations. The United States and Russia have chosen different legal grounds to join Syria in the fight against the Islamic State. An important reason for this is that the two countries are engaged in an international debate over whether the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad is a legitimate government, which is fundamentally the international norm of "what is a legitimate government". The external manifestation of the dispute on the plane, It concerns China's strategic interests and deserves China's close attention.
【作者单位】：安徽财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“叙利亚危机中大国博弈的国际规范问题研究”(项目编号:16BGJ068)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D815;D99

【相似文献】