欧盟反倾销法价值取向的法经济学研究

发布时间：2018-03-18 03:09

本文选题：欧盟反倾销　切入点：价值取向　出处：《浙江工商大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在当前的国际环境下,国际贸易自由化不断深化,各国的经济互补性、相互依存度和利益契合点不断加强。尤其是受到西方文化洗礼的欧盟地区,其对外开放速度更加迅速。与此同时,欧盟的反倾销法律和实践却时常发出不和谐的声音。文章重点运用法经济学研究方法,从法律供求、成本收益、均衡等方面对欧盟反倾销法的价值取向进行深入分析。首先,文章介绍了法经济学的研究方法,其运用微观经济学理论和方法来对法律进行分析,把效益作为法律的基本价值目标和评价标准,试图在法学“公平”、“正义”的价值取向基础上,渗入“效益”、“成本”、“均衡”、“博弈”等经济学价值取向。最终指出在欧盟反倾销实施过程中,应发挥法经济学的方法论特点,为欧盟反倾销法的立法和实践提出合理且符合实际的指导建议。其次,对倾销、反倾销和反倾销法,以及反倾销法价值取向等概念进行法经济学解释,指出反倾销法的价值取向是欧盟确定对外实施反倾销的重要理论依据。在反倾销问题上,各国既重视消除来自国外具有竞争优势产业的竞争行为,为国内产业的健康发展创造环境,又有义务为本国／地区的消费者提供优厚的社会福利,故包括欧盟在内的反倾销实施者必须在保障本国／地区工业发展,保护消费者(包括进口商、下游用户等)利益之间做出权衡,使各个利益主体在一定时期内能够维持利益均衡。再次,通过欧盟反倾销法的供给需求分析,指出因倾销行为增加交易成本,无法达到资源最优配置的效果,故产生对反倾销法律的需求。但因实践中倾销行为却缺少存在的社会基础,由此说明欧盟反倾销法存在现实的供求偏差,得出欧盟反倾销法“限制竞争”的本质；另外,通过欧盟反倾销法的成本收益分析,指出欧盟反倾销法在实施过程中,难以证明其收益大于成本的结论,仅是欧盟为实现反倾销涉及的各方主体间的利益均衡状态。然后,指出虽然欧盟反倾销法无法实现立法的初衷,但其存在一定的合理性。故对欧盟反倾销法实施的合理性进行重新定位,得出欧盟反倾销法在满足局部供求平衡、缓解竞争压力、避免贸易冲突、促进贸易自由化等方面存在现实合理性。最后,对欧盟反倾销法的价值取向进行综述,得出公平和效率均不是欧盟反倾销的价值取向,均衡才是欧盟反倾销法的真正价值取向所在。本文通过对欧盟反倾销法价值取向的深入分析,可为今后各国反倾销立法的确立和完善,以及客观分析国际反倾销法在实践中的实际功效有借鉴作用。
[Abstract]:In the current international environment, the liberalization of international trade is deepening, the economies of various countries are complementary, the interdependence and the common points of interest are constantly strengthened. Especially in the EU region, which is baptized by Western culture, At the same time, the European Union's anti-dumping laws and practices often make a discordant sound. This article focuses on the use of legal and economic research methods, from the legal supply and demand, cost-benefit, The value orientation of EU anti-dumping law is deeply analyzed from the aspects of equilibrium and so on. First of all, the article introduces the research methods of law and economics. It uses microeconomics theory and method to analyze the law, and regards the benefit as the basic value goal and evaluation standard of law. On the basis of the value orientation of law "fairness" and "justice", this paper attempts to infiltrate the value orientation of economics such as "benefit", "cost", "equilibrium" and "game". Finally, it points out that the methodological features of law and economics should be brought into play in the process of EU anti-dumping implementation. This paper puts forward reasonable and practical guidance for the legislation and practice of EU anti-dumping law. Secondly, the concepts of dumping, anti-dumping and antidumping law, as well as the value orientation of antidumping law are explained by law and economics. It is pointed out that the value orientation of antidumping law is the important theoretical basis for the EU to determine the implementation of antidumping. In the case of anti-dumping, all countries attach importance to eliminating the competitive behavior of foreign industries with competitive advantages. Create an environment for the healthy development of domestic industries and have an obligation to provide favourable social welfare for consumers in the country / region. Therefore, anti-dumping practitioners, including the European Union, must safeguard the industrial development of their own countries / regions. Protect the interests of consumers (including importers, downstream users, etc.) to make a balance between the interests of various stakeholders in a certain period of time. Thirdly, through the analysis of supply and demand of EU anti-dumping law, it is pointed out that the optimal allocation of resources can not be achieved because of the increase of transaction cost due to dumping. Therefore, there is a demand for antidumping law. However, there is no social foundation for dumping in practice, which shows that there is a realistic deviation between supply and demand in EU anti-dumping law, and the essence of EU antidumping law is "restricting competition". Based on the cost-benefit analysis of EU anti-dumping law, it is pointed out that it is difficult to prove that the benefit of EU anti-dumping law is greater than that of cost in the course of its implementation, and it is only a state of interest equilibrium between the parties involved in EU anti-dumping. Then, it points out that although the EU anti-dumping law cannot realize the original intention of legislation, it has certain rationality. Therefore, the rationality of EU anti-dumping law is reoriented, and the EU anti-dumping law meets the balance of local supply and demand. It is reasonable to relieve competition pressure, avoid trade conflict and promote trade liberalization. Finally, the value orientation of EU anti-dumping law is summarized, and it is concluded that fairness and efficiency are not the value orientation of EU anti-dumping. The balance is the true value orientation of EU anti-dumping law. Through the in-depth analysis of the value orientation of EU antidumping law, this paper can establish and perfect the antidumping legislation of various countries in the future. And objective analysis of international anti-dumping law in practice of the actual effect of reference.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】