国际法院对安理会的司法审查权刍议——以国际组织宪政为视角

发布时间：2018-03-19 23:00

本文选题：安理会　切入点：国际法院　出处：《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》2011年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：国际社会对安理会根据《联合国宪章》通过的一些决议和采取的行动是否超越《联合国宪章》赋予的权限存在争议,安理会的一些决议和行动被认为超越了其执行职能而行使了决议造法职能,安理会的行动体越来越现出"自组织性"特征,面临合法性的质疑。西方国际法学学者则持坚决主张对国际法院对安理会的司法审查权,以加强对安理会行动的制衡。对安理会决议进行司法审查的必要性还表现在安理会决议不能违背国际法。安理会和国际法院的关系问题是联合国的宪政问题,是否引入司法审查关系到联合国的未来发展。目前学者关于建立国际法院对安理会司法审查权有关路径的建议均需对联合国制度进行重大改革。
[Abstract]:The international community has disputed whether some of the resolutions and actions taken by the Security Council under the Charter of the United Nations exceed its mandate under the Charter of the United Nations, A number of resolutions and actions of the Council have been considered to go beyond its executive functions and to exercise its legislative functions, and the Council's actors have increasingly taken on a "self-organizing" character, Faced with a question of legitimacy, Western scholars of international law strongly advocate the judicial review of the Security Council by the International Court of Justice. The need for judicial review of Security Council resolutions is also manifested in the fact that Security Council resolutions cannot contravene international law... the question of the relationship between the Security Council and the International Court of Justice is a constitutional issue of the United Nations. Whether or not to introduce judicial review is related to the future development of the United Nations. At present, scholars' suggestions on the path to the establishment of the International Court of Justice for the judicial review power of the Security Council require a major reform of the United Nations system.
【作者单位】：西北政法大学;中央财经大学会计学院;
【基金】：教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(项目编号:NCET-09-695)
【分类号】：D99

【参考文献】