WTO欧盟对华皮鞋反倾销案研究

发布时间：2018-03-20 17:35

本文选题：中国产品　切入点：欧盟反倾销法　出处：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：作为中国最大的贸易伙伴，欧盟在与中国经济交往的过程中，为了保护其成员国的利益，频繁对中国产品发起反倾销调查。本文针对WTO中的欧盟对华皮鞋征收反倾销税案进行研究，以期从法律层面为中国政府与企业有效应对欧盟反倾销措施提出对策、建议，保障中国对外贸易健康、正常发展，维护国家贸易利益。本文共分为四部分。第一部分是欧盟对华皮鞋反倾销案的案由和基本案情的介绍。第二部分是本案的法律争议焦点及其研究。本案的争议焦点主要包含：倾销的确定、对中国企业市场经济地位的判定、欧盟反倾销法“共同体利益”条款的适用、关于确定巴西为替代国、欧盟认定中国产品构成倾销的相关程序规则的合理性。第三部分是中国应对欧盟反倾销的措施。分析了欧盟对华反倾销的依据和本案的影响，提出了中国应对欧盟对华反倾销的若干措施。主要包括中国政府和中国企业两个方面。从政府角度，，应积极利用世贸组织争端解决机制来保护本国利益；注意加强与欧盟间相关领域的谈判；同时加强对欧盟产品采取两反一保措施。从企业角度，应当积极应诉，主动利用欧盟自身的法律渠道维护企业的合法权益。第四部分是研究结论，总结了中国政府以及企业针对类似案件，如何来维护自身的合法权益，以期为应对此类案件提供有益的借鉴。
[Abstract]:As China's biggest trading partner in EU and Chinese economic exchanges in the process, in order to protect the interests of Member States, frequent anti-dumping investigation to Chinese products. According to WTO in the EU anti-dumping case of leather shoes, in order from the legal level for Chinese government and enterprises to effectively deal with the EU the anti-dumping measures put forward countermeasures and suggestions, guarantee Chinese foreign trade healthy and normal development, safeguarding national interests of trade.
This article is divided into four parts.
The first part is the EU anti-dumping case of action and the introduction of the basic facts.
The second part is the case study. The focus of legal disputes and the focus of controversy in this case mainly includes: the determination of dumping, to determine the status of market economy China enterprises, application of EU anti-dumping law "community interest" clause, on the determination of the country of Brazil as an alternative, the rationality of the relevant rules of procedure to identify China EU dumping products.
The third part is the China deal with the EU anti-dumping measures. Analysis of the impact of the EU anti-dumping on the basis of the case, put forward Chinese deal with the EU anti-dumping measures. Two aspects including Chinese government and China enterprises. From the perspective of the government, should actively use the WTO to protect its interests dispute settlement mechanism; pay attention to strengthening the relevant areas of negotiations with the European Union; at the same time strengthen two anti conservation measures on EU products. From the angle of enterprises, should actively respond to the EU's own initiative to use legal channels to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises.
The fourth part is the conclusion of the study. It summarizes how the Chinese government and enterprises maintain their legitimate rights and interests for similar cases, in order to provide useful references for such cases.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】