当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

从国际法角度看当今中日东海争端

发布时间:2018-03-26 15:54

  本文选题:东海划界 切入点:中间线原则 出处:《黑龙江大学》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:东海是中国的三大边缘海之一。近年来中日两国因为东海大陆架划界、钓鱼岛归属等问题纠纷不断。本文从国际法的角度论述了当今中日东海争端的由来和解决前景。文章首先介绍了东海的地理位置和战略地位以及中日东海问题的起因和发展趋势。而后介绍在国际法中关于大陆架划界的规定,对钓鱼岛和冲绳海槽在东海大陆架划界问题中的地位进行了介绍、并描述了中日两国各自对钓鱼岛和冲绳海槽地位的理解。之后介绍中日两国在东海大陆架划界问题上的立场和依据,并以国际法和国际判例驳斥了日方“中间线”原则的不适用性。最后文章进一步探讨中日东海问题的解决方式和前途,包括政治解决的前景、对于东海问题提交国际仲裁结果的估计和“搁置争议,共同开发”的可行性及与台湾共同合作维护民族权益的可能性,争取在维护主权的前提下尽量以和平谈判的方式解决东海问题。
[Abstract]:The East China Sea is one of the three major marginal seas in China. In recent years, China and Japan have delimited the continental shelf of the East China Sea. The article discusses the origin and prospect of the dispute between China and Japan in the East China Sea from the angle of international law. The article first introduces the geographical position and strategic position of the East China Sea and the relationship between China and Japan in the East China Sea. Causes and trends. The provisions of international law relating to the delimitation of the continental shelf are then introduced, The status of the Diaoyu Islands and the Okinawa trough in the delimitation of the continental shelf in the East China Sea is introduced. It also describes the respective understandings of the Diaoyu Islands and the Okinawa trough between China and Japan, and then introduces the position and basis of China and Japan on the delimitation of the continental shelf in the East China Sea. And refutes the inapplicability of the "intermediate line" principle of the Japanese side with international law and jurisprudence. Finally, the article further discusses the solution and future of the East China Sea issue between China and Japan, including the prospect of a political solution. With regard to the estimation of the outcome of international arbitration submitted to the East China Sea issue and the feasibility of "shelving disputes and jointly developing" and the possibility of cooperating with Taiwan in safeguarding the national rights and interests, Strive to resolve the East China Sea issue through peaceful negotiations on the premise of safeguarding sovereignty.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D993.5

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 余民才;中日东海油气争端的国际法分析——兼论解决争端的可能方案[J];法商研究;2005年01期

2 吴慧;;国际海洋法争端解决机制对钓鱼岛争端的影响[J];国际关系学院学报;2007年04期

3 李文涛,黄六一,唐衍力;从国际司法判例和国际海洋法看中日海洋区域的划界[J];海洋湖沼通报;2001年01期

4 邹晓翔;钓鱼岛主权与划界分离论──马英九《从新海洋法论钓鱼台列屿与东海划界问题》一书的内容及理论价值[J];现代日本经济;1995年Z1期



本文编号:1668531

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1668531.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户186ab***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com