国际体育解纷机制的复级化及其正当性——基于CAS仲裁体制之研析

发布时间：2018-03-31 14:33

本文选题：体育仲裁　切入点：一裁终局　出处：《天津体育学院学报》2011年04期

【摘要】：体育争议因其时效特性尤其强调争议解决机制应具有高效品质。以CAS为典型的体育解纷体制却以复级化为普遍态势,它位于各体育组织之外构成其内部解纷机制的二级延伸,这对体育解纷机制的高效性造成了负面影响,对解纷效率有所贬损。效率的局部丧失辩证地为体育争议的复级解纷机制带来了积极补偿。以CAS为顶点的复级伞形解纷机制有利于公正、中立地化解体育争议,并通过CAS发挥裁决优化和规范统一的功能。我国体育争议解决机制的复级化重构或者以CAS为复级管辖机构,或者以中国专业体育仲裁机构为复级管辖机构,后者更符合中国体育发展的独特规律。尽快建立《体育法》上专业体育仲裁机构成为该方案的前提与关键。
[Abstract]:Sports disputes, due to their time-effect characteristics, especially emphasize that the dispute resolution mechanism should be of high efficient quality. The sports dispute resolution system, which is typical of CAS, has become a general situation, and it is located outside the sports organizations to form the secondary extension of its internal dispute resolution mechanism. This has had a negative impact on the efficiency of the sports dispute resolution mechanism, The partial loss of efficiency has brought positive compensation to the mechanism of resolving disputes in sports. The umbrella resolution mechanism with CAS as its vertex is beneficial to the fair and neutral resolution of sports disputes. Through CAS, we can realize the function of optimizing and standardizing the decision. The reconstruction of sports dispute settlement mechanism in China is either based on CAS or China's professional sports arbitration institution. The latter is more in line with the unique law of sports development in China, and the establishment of a professional sports arbitration institution in the Sports Law becomes the prerequisite and key of the scheme as soon as possible.
【作者单位】：重庆大学法学博士后流动站;
【基金】：中国法学会部级法学研究课题(项目编号:CLS-D1040)
【分类号】：D997.4

【共引文献】