TPP知识产权刑事保护规则探究

发布时间：2018-04-03 22:11

本文选题：TPP　切入点：知识产权　出处：《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：通过对TPP知识产权条款中涉及刑事保护规则的分析总结,可看出TPP对知识产权的保护设置了较TRIPs协议更高的要求,主要表现在对"商业规模"进行了明确的规定,对盗摄电影的刑事保护提出了强行性要求、针对不同的行为在不同情况下适用何种刑罚和程序进行了明确,在一定程度上扩大了知识产权刑法保护的范围。TPP协议中的这些变化,意味着我国知识产权刑法保护相关规则需要调整,并且应该注意:坚持现有法律体系中有关"商业规模"的规定;保留关于刑罚标准和救济方式的相关规定;盗摄电影暂时不纳入刑事保护体系;可对进口环节的假冒商标行为适用刑事程序和处罚的问题进行规定,以便与现有海关执法措施有效对接。
[Abstract]:Through the analysis and summary of the criminal protection rules involved in the TPP intellectual property provisions, we can see that TPP has set higher requirements for the protection of intellectual property rights than the TRIPs protocol, which is mainly manifested in the clear provisions on the "commercial scale".It puts forward mandatory requirements for the criminal protection of movie theft, clarifies the penalties and procedures applicable to different acts under different circumstances, and to a certain extent expands the scope of criminal protection of intellectual property rights. These changes in the TPP agreement.This means that the relevant rules of criminal law protection of intellectual property rights need to be adjusted, and that attention should be paid to: insisting on the "commercial scale" provisions in the existing legal system, retaining the relevant provisions on penalty standards and remedies;Theft of films is not included in the criminal protection system for the time being; criminal procedures and penalties can be applied to the import of counterfeit trademarks in order to effectively link up with existing customs enforcement measures.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学;
【分类号】：D997.1

【相似文献】