论不循规旅客的处罚和《东京公约》现代化
发布时间:2018-04-04 09:29
本文选题:不循规旅客 切入点:东京公约 出处:《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2014年04期
【摘要】:随着不循规旅客事件的不断增加,国际航空界要求加强依法惩处不循规旅客的呼声也日益增强。同《海牙公约》和《蒙特利尔公约》相比,《东京公约》是最适宜调整不循规乘客处罚的国际条约。但是,面对不循规旅客事件的新发展,《东京公约》也暴露出对"犯罪"和"行为"缺乏清晰定义,"飞行中"区间界定导致管辖期间出现空白,主权国家管辖权漏洞,以及引渡条款缺失等瑕疵,不能有效规制不循规乘客。鉴于此,国际社会应当从设立犯罪和不循规行为清单,对"飞行中"做出同其他公约相一致的定义,扩大管辖权基础,补充有关移交和引渡的规定等方面对《东京公约》进行现代化。
[Abstract]:With the increasing number of irregular passenger incidents, the international aviation industry calls for strengthening the punishment of irregular passengers according to the law.Compared with the Hague Convention and the Montreal Convention, the Tokyo Convention is the most suitable international treaty to adjust the penalty for irregular passengers.However, in the face of new developments in irregular passenger incidents, the Tokyo Convention has also revealed a lack of clear definitions of "crime" and "conduct". The definition of "in-flight" zones leads to gaps in the jurisdictional period and loopholes in sovereign national jurisdiction.As well as the absence of extradition provisions and other defects, can not effectively regulate irregular passengers.In view of this, the international community should expand its jurisdictional base by establishing a list of crimes and acts of non-compliance, with a definition of "in flight" consistent with other conventions,To modernize the Tokyo Convention by supplementing the provisions on surrender and extradition.
【作者单位】: 国家空管法规标准研究中心;北京航空航天大学航空法律和标准研究所;北京航空航天大学法学院;
【分类号】:D993.4;D997.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘浩;;民用航空器上不循规旅客处罚比较研究[J];北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版);2014年03期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
,本文编号:1709362
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1709362.html