国际航空仲裁制度研究——兼评1999年《蒙特利尔公约》第34条

发布时间：2018-04-04 10:49

本文选题：航空仲裁　切入点：机构仲裁　出处：《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：中国航空仲裁存在适用范围不一致、临时仲裁承认与执行不对等、上海国际航空仲裁院的发展面临诸多挑战等问题。为健全多元化争议解决机制,有效发挥航空仲裁的原本价值,中国应统一和明确航空仲裁的范围,以上海国际航空仲裁院为依托,以航空临时仲裁为试点,结合国际社会的通行做法和实践,以开放的姿态认可中国国内航空临时仲裁的合法性,实行航空机构仲裁与临时仲裁"双轨制"。建议在初期通过一般性的仲裁机构解决争议,在中期倾向于航空临时仲裁,在后期提交专门的航空仲裁机构,从而分阶段、有重点和有秩序地推进中国航空仲裁制度的改革与发展。
[Abstract]:There are some problems in China's aviation arbitration, such as inconsistent scope of application, unequal recognition and enforcement of temporary arbitration, and many challenges to the development of Shanghai International Aviation Arbitration Institute.In order to improve the pluralistic dispute settlement mechanism and give full play to the original value of aviation arbitration, China should unify and clarify the scope of aviation arbitration, relying on the Shanghai International Aviation Arbitration Institute and taking temporary aviation arbitration as a pilot,Combined with the international practice and practice, the legitimacy of China's domestic temporary aviation arbitration is recognized with an open attitude, and the "dual track" system of aviation institution arbitration and temporary arbitration is implemented.It is recommended that disputes be settled in the initial period through a general arbitration body, that in the medium term there be a preference for ad hoc aviation arbitration, and at a later stage be submitted to a specialized aviation arbitration body, thus being phased in.To promote the reform and development of China's aviation arbitration system in a focused and orderly manner.
【作者单位】：西北政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会部级法学研究课题“中国空域管理法律制度的完善研究”(CLS2016C45) 西北政法大学国际法学科青年学术创新团队项目
【分类号】：D993.4

【相似文献】