南海海洋环保合作的困境与出路——兼及对“南海仲裁案”相关仲裁事项的辩驳

发布时间：2018-04-04 11:10

本文选题：南海　切入点：海洋环保　出处：《外交评论(外交学院学报)》2017年05期

【摘要】：2016年审结的"南海仲裁案"被视为"第一起全面涉及《海洋法公约》环境保护条款"的案例。菲律宾在其"海洋环保类"诉求中,指控中国南沙建设活动以及纵容渔民在争议岛礁附近海域从事捕捞珍稀物种和危害海洋环境的行为,破坏海洋环境,违反了《海洋法公约》。围绕"南海仲裁案",菲律宾及南海域外国家以"环境正义"为名展开对中国的指控,也暴露了南海海洋环境和海洋生物资源养护和管理区域合作机制的缺位。本文从"南海仲裁案"出发并以此为主要案例,着重分析南海环境区域合作的现状,指出南海环保合作法制机制存在的若干问题,并对中国推动南海海洋环保和渔业区域合作的机制构建提出相应建议。
[Abstract]:The "South China Sea Arbitration case" concluded in 2016 is considered "the first comprehensive case involving the environmental protection provisions of UNCLOS".In its claim of "marine environmental protection", the Philippines accused China of Nansha construction activities and connivance of fishermen engaging in the fishing of rare species and endangering the marine environment in the waters near the disputed islands and reefs, damaging the marine environment and violating the Convention on the Law of the Sea.In the context of the South China Sea Arbitration case, the Philippines and other countries in the South China Sea launched charges against China in the name of "environmental justice", which also exposed the absence of a regional cooperation mechanism for the conservation and management of the marine environment and marine living resources in the South China Sea.Starting from the South China Sea Arbitration case and taking it as the main case, this paper emphatically analyzes the present situation of the South China Sea environmental regional cooperation, and points out some problems existing in the legal mechanism of the South China Sea environmental protection cooperation.Some suggestions are put forward for the establishment of a mechanism for China to promote regional cooperation in marine environmental protection and fisheries in the South China Sea.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学凯原法学院海洋法治研究中心;
【基金】：笔者主持的国家社科基金青年项目“钓鱼岛争端视角下琉球法律地位问题研究”(13CFX123)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】