论知识产权侵权货物的海关处置措施

发布时间：2018-04-04 16:11

本文选题：侵权货物　切入点：知识产权　出处：《山西大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：TRIPS协定的达成体现了知识产权保护的国际化趋势。但美国和欧盟等发达国家并不满足于维持TRIPS协定所规定的知识产权最低保护条款,而是在多边、区域及双边领域同步推行其超TRIPS协定的知识产权保护战略,至今仍存有争议的ACTA协议就是一个典型例证。笔者认为,无论是美国过于强化知识产权保护,还是中国相对弱化知识产权的同时顾及第三方利益,都是TRIPS协定所允许的,是两国经济利益存在差异的背景下导致的立法取向不同的结果。笔者回顾了2007年美国诉中国知识产权第一案,借以对笔者观点加以佐证。 20世纪中期以来,随着国际贸易的迅速发展,侵犯知识产权的非法货物的国际贸易数量也呈上升趋势；事实上,我国海关处置侵犯知识产权货物的数量和由其引发的对外贸易纠纷也逐年增加。笔者通过检索发现,目前国内学者的关注点通常局限于处置知识产权侵权货物的海关执法层面,极少有论著从立法角度对海关处置措施进行分析。为此,笔者运用法学专业知识,结合对相关技术知识的理解,借鉴国外先进经验,就知识产权侵权货物海关处置措施的立法问题进行分析,通过对比国际国内立法,认识到我国知识产权海关保护立法的缺陷与完善必要性。本论文首先对美国诉中国知识产权第一案进行分析,揭示出发达国家推行超TRIPS协定的实质；继而立足我国目前知识产权侵权货物海关执法现状,提出我国知识产权侵权货物海关处置措施立法上的缺陷及完善的必要性。接下来通过借鉴知识产权侵权货物海关处置措施的国际立法,对比知识产权侵权货物海关处置措施的国内立法相关规定,并结合我国的国情,多角度探析知识产权海关处置措施的国际立法趋势,以求更准确地把握我国的应对策略。
[Abstract]:The conclusion of TRIPS Agreement reflects the international trend of intellectual property protection.However, the developed countries, such as the United States and the European Union, are not satisfied with maintaining the minimum protection provisions of intellectual property rights as stipulated in the TRIPS Agreement. Instead, they simultaneously implement their super-#en1# intellectual property protection strategies in the multilateral, regional and bilateral fields.The controversial ACTA protocol is a typical example.In my opinion, whether it is the United States to strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, or China's relative weakening of intellectual property rights while taking into account the interests of third parties, it is permitted by the TRIPS Agreement.It is the result of different legislative orientation caused by the difference of economic interests between the two countries.The author reviewed the first case of American v. China intellectual property in 2007 to prove the author's point of view.Since the middle of the 20th century, with the rapid development of international trade, the amount of international trade in illegal goods infringing intellectual property rights has also been on the rise; in fact,The quantity of infringing intellectual property goods and the foreign trade disputes caused by them are increasing year by year.Through the search, the author found that the domestic scholars usually focus on the disposal of intellectual property rights infringement of goods in the level of customs law enforcement, rarely from the legislative point of view of the analysis of the measures of customs disposal.For this reason, the author applies the professional knowledge of law, combines the understanding of relevant technical knowledge, draws lessons from the foreign advanced experience, carries on the analysis to the intellectual property rights infringement goods customs disposal measure legislation question, through contrasts the international and the domestic legislation,It is necessary to realize the defects and perfection of the legislation on the customs protection of intellectual property in our country.This paper first analyzes the case of the United States v. China intellectual property right, reveals the essence of the super TRIPS agreement in developed countries, and then bases on the current situation of customs enforcement of intellectual property infringement goods in China.This paper puts forward the legislative defects and the necessity of perfecting the measures of customs disposal of intellectual property rights infringing goods in our country.Next, by drawing lessons from the international legislation on customs measures for handling goods infringing intellectual property rights, comparing the relevant provisions of domestic legislation on measures of customs disposal of goods infringing intellectual property rights, and combining with the national conditions of our country,This paper probes into the international legislative trend of the measures of customs disposal of intellectual property in order to grasp the countermeasures of our country more accurately.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.4;D922.294;D997.1

【参考文献】