英国推动禁奴制度国际法制化的路径研究
发布时间:2018-04-04 18:34
本文选题:英国 切入点:禁奴制度 出处:《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:在国际法的发展演进中,大国是促进其发展的重要变量,是主要的推动力之一。历史经验证明,荷兰、法国、英国、美国在成为世界强国的道路上,在以军事、政治和经济上获得了世界优势地位的同时,无不进行国际法制建设,积极推动符合其需要的制度国际法制化。本文以英国推动禁止奴隶制度国际法制化这一具体实践为例,探究大国推动国际法制发展的理念、动力、路径及其规律,进而为我国参与和引领国际治理体系提供经验与借鉴。本论文共分为五部分:首先是绪论部分。此部分作者阐述了大国推动国际法制化建设的研究背景、研究意义以及研究的创新点等,为接下来深入探讨英国进行国际法制化建设的路径奠定前期基础。第一章是英国推动禁奴制度国际法制化的国内立法分析。该部分主要讨论了英国通过国内立法的形式实现了禁奴制度国内法制化,并着重分析了影响英国推行禁奴制度国内立法的诸多因素。第二章是英国推动禁奴制度国际法制化的国际条约路径分析。这一章探讨了英国如何运用国际条约这一路径实现其推动禁奴制度国际法制化的目标。在此路径下,无论是条约的签订还是保障条约的执行,英国都积极地参与其中并发挥着促进与引导作用。第三章是英国推动禁奴制度国际法制化的国际习惯路径分析。此部分着重分析了英国将禁止奴隶制度推向世界过程中所运用的国际习惯,从利益偶合模式、威逼胁迫模式以及合作协调模式这三个不同的方式具体分析了英国对国际习惯路径的运用。第四章是英国推动禁奴制度国际法制化的规律总结。从英国推动禁奴制度国际法制化的路径实践中,可以总结出几点规律,包括形成思想领域的共识;遵循国内、国际的环境变化;综合运用国际条约与国际习惯的路径;抓好自身理论建设;以及对参与过程中的具体细节加以关注。这些规律的总结为大国参与、引领国际法制化建设提供了切实可行的建议。
[Abstract]:In the evolution of international law, great power is an important variable to promote its development and one of the main driving forces.Historical experience has proved that the Netherlands, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States, on the way to becoming a world power, have gained a dominant position in the world with military, political and economic advantages, and at the same time have all carried out the construction of international legal system.To actively promote the international legal system in accordance with its needs.Taking the concrete practice of Britain to promote the international legalization of the prohibition of slavery as an example, this paper probes into the idea, motive force, path and law of the great powers to promote the development of international legal system, thus providing experience and reference for our country to participate in and lead the international governance system.This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction.In this part, the author expounds the research background, significance and innovation of the international legalization construction promoted by the big countries, which lays the foundation for the further discussion on the path of the international legalization construction in Britain.The first chapter is the analysis of the domestic legislation of the United Kingdom to promote the international legalization of slavery system.In this part, the author mainly discusses the realization of the domestic legalization of the slavery system in Britain through the form of domestic legislation, and emphatically analyzes many factors that affect the implementation of the domestic legislation of the slavery system in the United Kingdom.The second chapter is the analysis of the international treaty path of the United Kingdom to promote the international legalization of slavery system.This chapter explores how Britain uses international treaties to achieve its goal of promoting the international legalization of slavery.In this way, whether it is the signing of treaties or the guarantee of their implementation, Britain actively participates in them and plays a role in promoting and guiding them.The third chapter is the analysis of the international customary path to promote the international legalization of slavery system in Britain.This part focuses on the analysis of the international customs used in the process of banning slavery in Britain, from the mode of coupling of interests.This paper analyzes the use of the international customary path in Britain in three different ways, namely, coercion and cooperation and coordination.The fourth chapter is a summary of the law of promoting the international legalization of slavery system in Britain.From the path practice of promoting the international legalization of slavery system in Britain, we can sum up several rules, including forming a consensus in the field of thought, following the changes of domestic and international environment, synthetically applying international treaties and international customs;Do a good job of their own theoretical construction; and the process of participation in the specific details of attention.The conclusion of these laws provides practical suggestions for big countries to participate and lead the construction of international legal system.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D99
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴晓晓;;国际关系理论研究的“实践转向”[J];求知导刊;2015年21期
2 袁莎;;“巴黎学派”与批判安全研究的“实践转向”[J];外交评论(外交学院学报);2015年05期
3 秦亚青;;行动的逻辑:西方国际关系理论“知识转向”的意义[J];中国社会科学;2013年12期
4 金铮;;国际习惯法在英国的适用问题研究[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2011年03期
5 杨冰双;;国际法上事实承认与法律承认的区分与矛盾——从国际法案例看英国国际法上的承认的理论及实践冲突[J];知识经济;2010年19期
6 朱立群;聂文娟;;国际关系理论研究的“实践转向”[J];世界经济与政治;2010年08期
7 吴修申;;英国:从头号奴隶贩子到国际废奴运动的积极推动者[J];历史教学(中学版);2010年07期
8 何志鹏;;国际法的遵行机制探究[J];东方法学;2009年05期
9 蔡高强;;大国崛起与国际法的发展——兼谈中国和平崛起的国际法环境[J];湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
10 张旭;陈晓律;;英国大众废奴运动的兴起:社会运动的视角[J];学海;2009年03期
,本文编号:1711193
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1711193.html