CISG第48条卖方补救权研究

发布时间：2018-04-13 10:26

本文选题：CISG + 卖方补救权　；参考：《国际商务研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：买卖合同各方当事人均应严格按合同及法律之规定履行各自义务。一旦卖方未能按合同及法律规定履行义务,买方有权追究卖方违约责任。然而,基于诚信原则、鼓励交易与合同维持等精神,CISG赋予卖方在不履行时补救其履行的权利。但为维持买卖双方利益之平衡,CISG根据法定补救权与意定补救权之不同而分别设定了行使条件。在卖方补救不履行期间,买方有权中止履行对应义务,但不得行使与卖方补救权相悖之救济措施。补救期限内卖方未能补救违约的,买方可行使法律所规定之救济措施。补救期限内即使卖方已做出补救,也不影响买方就其所遭受之损失请求损害赔偿。买方非法拒绝卖方补救时,买方丧失相应法律救济权利。当卖方补救权与买方合同解除权、实际履行请求权及宽限期通知制度相冲突时,哪一种权利优先应视法定补救权与意定补救权之不同而定。
[Abstract]:The parties to the contract shall perform their obligations strictly in accordance with the contract and the law.In the event that the seller fails to perform its obligations under the contract and the law, the buyer is entitled to hold the seller liable for breach of contract.However, based on the principle of good faith, the spirit of CISG, such as encouraging transaction and contract maintenance, gives the seller the right to remedy performance in case of non-performance.However, in order to maintain the balance of interests between the buyer and the seller, CISG has set the conditions for its exercise according to the difference between the legal remedy right and the optional remedy right.The buyer shall have the right to suspend the performance of the corresponding obligation during the seller's non-performance, but shall not exercise any remedy inconsistent with the seller's right to remedy.If the seller fails to remedy the breach within the time limit, the buyer may exercise the remedies prescribed by law.Even if the seller has made a remedy within the time limit of the remedy, it shall not affect the buyer's claim for damages for the loss suffered.If the buyer unlawfully refuses the seller's remedy, the buyer loses the corresponding legal remedy right.When the seller's right to remedy is in conflict with the buyer's right to terminate the contract, the right of actual performance and the system of notice of grace period, which right should be given priority depends on the difference between the legal right of remedy and the right of contingent remedy.
【作者单位】：泉州师范学院陈守仁工商信息学院;
【基金】：2015年福建省社科联项目“债务人补救权比较研究”(项目编号:FJ2015C036)
【分类号】：D996.1

【相似文献】