论《能源宪章条约》投资仲裁中的“投资”:以ICSID仲裁与国际商事仲裁的比较为视角

发布时间：2018-04-13 14:10

本文选题：《能源宪章条约》 + ICSID仲裁　；参考：《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年07期

【摘要】：ECT投资仲裁案件的当事方根据条约第26条将案件提交ICSID(International Center for Set-tlement of Investment Disputes,解决国际投资争端仲裁中心)仲裁和国际商事仲裁时,两种仲裁机构对于"投资"的定义和范围有着不同的解释。总的说来,国际商事仲裁对ECT下的"投资"的解释更为宽泛,再加上其具有快捷性以及费用低廉的特点,因此,对于中小投资者来说,将纯商业性的争端提交国际商事仲裁相比提交ICSID仲裁更为适宜。相比之下,ICSID仲裁为ECT下的投资设定了一个更高的"门槛",但是当一项ECT下的投资已构成ICSID下合格的投资时,ICSID仲裁所具有的裁决的终局性以及对投资保护的专门性等优势,又使得ICSID仲裁此时成为大型投资者更好的选择。
[Abstract]:ECT investment arbitration parties according to Article twenty-sixth of the treaty will be submitted to the ICSID (International Center for case Set-tlement of Investment Disputes, to solve the International Investment Dispute Arbitration Center) arbitration and international commercial arbitration, the two arbitration institutions have different explanation for the definition and scope of investment ". In general, international commercial the arbitration of ECT under the" investment "to explain more broadly, and it has characteristics of fast and low cost, therefore, for small investors, the pure commercial dispute to international commercial arbitration compared to ICSID arbitration is more suitable. In contrast, the ICSID has set a higher the" threshold "for ECT investment, but when a ECT investment investment constituted the qualified ICSID when ICSID has the final arbitration award and the special advantages of investment protection, and Making ICSID arbitration a better choice for large investors at this time.

【作者单位】：暨南大学人文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目《发达国家新能源法律政策研究及中国的战略选择》(批准号:09&ZD048) 教育部人文社会科学一般项目《〈能源宪章条约〉的争端解决机制研究》(批准号:09YJC820044)
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】