国际儿童诱拐案件处理路径上的新发展——评美国法院的“进一步分析方法”

发布时间：2018-04-16 05:35

本文选题：重大伤害危险例外 + 进一步分析方法　；参考：《青少年犯罪问题》2011年04期

【摘要】：海牙诱拐公约中规定了重大伤害危险例外,当存在这些情形时缔约国就无义务返还被诱拐儿童。不过,美国法院在适用该例外时形成了"进一步分析方法",要求存在重大伤害危险情形时需做进一步的审查,对儿童惯常居所地国是否存在有效的保护措施或者可行的替代方法加以审查,以最终断定重大伤害危险例外的适用。虽然这种分析方法似乎符合海牙诱拐公约的快速返还目的,但是,它并不符合公约的根本目标,与儿童最大利益原则之间也存在较大的差异,从而不利于儿童权利的保护。
[Abstract]:The Hague Convention on Abduction provides for exceptions to the risk of significant harm, in which case States parties are not obliged to return abducted children.However, in applying the exception, United States courts have developed a "further analytical approach" that requires further review when there is a risk of significant harm,Review of the existence of effective protection measures or viable alternatives in the country of habitual residence of the child, with a view to determining ultimately the application of the exception to the risk of significant harm.Although this method of analysis seems to be in line with the purpose of rapid return of the Hague Convention on Abduction, it is not in line with the fundamental objectives of the Convention and there is a significant difference between the principle of the best interests of the child and the principle of the best interests of the child, thus undermining the protection of the rights of the child.
【作者单位】：江西财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D971.2;D997

【相似文献】