中国对南海诸岛屿领土主权的一般国际法依据

发布时间：2018-04-17 04:31

本文选题：中国南海 + 南海仲裁案　；参考：《甘肃社会科学》2017年06期

【摘要】：所谓南海仲裁案裁决表面上不涉及领土主权和海洋划界,实质上通过回避《联合国海洋法公约》未尽事项应由一般国际法调整的基本原则,背离《维也纳条约法公约》的条约解释惯例,全盘否定中国基于历史性权利对南海诸岛屿的领土主权及其海洋权益。一般国际法要求确定领土主权归属应尊重历史;解决领土主权归属的争端应符合有效先占的原则;领土主权归属变化应满足一方主权者默认他方在其领土上的"主权行为"的条件。南海断续线是中国一贯主张基于长期历史过程确立的,对南海诸岛屿的领土主权之海上国界线。依据一般国际法上的时际法将南海断续线首先解读为中国对南海诸岛屿的领土归属界限的同时,应主张中国在南海诸岛屿的领土主权基础上,拥有岛屿相关海洋权益,并应对南海断续线内自然资源养护和管理以及尚未由《联合国海洋法公约》明确调整的保护生物多样性等事项,依据历史性权利行使全面的管辖权。
[Abstract]:The award in the so-called South China Sea arbitration case ostensibly does not deal with territorial sovereignty and maritime delimitation, and essentially by circumventing the basic principle that matters not covered by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea should be adjusted by general international law,Deviating from the treaty interpretation practice of the Vienna Convention on the Law of treaties, China totally negates the territorial sovereignty and maritime rights of China over the South China Sea islands on the basis of historical rights.General international law requires that the determination of territorial sovereignty should respect history, that the settlement of disputes over territorial sovereignty should conform to the principle of effective preoccupation;The change of territorial sovereignty should satisfy the condition that one sovereign acquiesce to the other party's "sovereign act" in its territory.The intermittent line of the South China Sea (SCS) is a maritime boundary of territorial sovereignty over the South China Sea islands established by a long historical process.According to the intertemporal law of general international law, the intermittent line of the South China Sea is first interpreted as the boundary of China's territorial ownership of the islands in the South China Sea, and at the same time China should claim that China has the rights and interests of the islands related to the sea on the basis of the territorial sovereignty of the islands in the South China Sea.In addition, the conservation and management of natural resources in the intermittent line of the South China Sea and the protection of biodiversity, which have not yet been explicitly adjusted by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, shall exercise full jurisdiction in accordance with historical rights.
【作者单位】：复旦大学法学院;
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】