论南海仲裁案仲裁庭对于《联合国海洋法公约》解释权的滥用

发布时间：2018-04-17 08:54

本文选题：南海仲裁案 + 《联合国海洋法公约》南海问题　；参考：《国际观察》2017年02期

【摘要】：2016年7月12日,倍受瞩目的南海仲裁案"最终裁决"出炉,仲裁庭延续了其在关于"管辖权和可受理性问题的裁决"当中的错误思路和做法,引起了中国政府的强烈抗议。这两份裁决的错误之处很多,其中仲裁庭滥用解释权,曲解《联合国海洋法公约》(以下简称《公约》)是最严重的错误之一。从国际法角度分析,仲裁庭滥用解释权不仅违反了《维也纳条约法公约》关于约文解释的基本语言逻辑、上下文、目的与宗旨、嗣后惯例以及善意原则,而且还不符合国际裁判机构关于条约解释的普遍实践。之所以出现这种状况,有仲裁庭刻意偏袒甚至帮助菲律宾、仲裁庭的条约解释权缺乏有效规制、强制性仲裁缺乏权威性等多种原因。其结果是既严重侵犯了中国在南海的主权,又严重破坏了《公约》的权威性与完整性。中国政府应当坚决揭露和批判仲裁庭滥用《公约》解释权的行为,并采取有效的应对措施。
[Abstract]:On July 12, 2016, the high-profile South China Sea arbitration case "final award", the arbitral tribunal continued its "jurisdiction and admissibility issues" in the wrong thinking and practice, caused strong protest from the Chinese government.There are many errors in these two decisions, among which the abusing of the power of interpretation by the arbitral tribunal and the misinterpretation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention") is one of the most serious mistakes.From the perspective of international law, the abuse of the power of interpretation by the arbitral tribunal not only violates the basic linguistic logic, context, object and purpose, subsequent practice and the principle of good faith of the Vienna Convention on the Law of treaties concerning the interpretation of the treaty,It is also inconsistent with the general practice of international judicial bodies concerning the interpretation of treaties.There are many reasons for this, such as the arbitration tribunal favoring or even helping the Philippines, the lack of effective regulation of the arbitration tribunal's power of treaty interpretation, the lack of authority of compulsory arbitration, and so on.As a result, China's sovereignty over the South China Sea and the authority and integrity of the Convention have been seriously violated.The Chinese Government should resolutely expose and criticize the abuse of the power of interpretation of the Convention by the arbitral tribunal and take effective measures to deal with it.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“国际法视角下中国与东盟国家磋商制定南海行为准则问题研究”(项目编号:16BFX207)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】