原告住所地与网络侵权案件的法院管辖

发布时间：2018-04-21 10:54

本文选题：网络侵权 + 法院管辖　；参考：《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年02期

【摘要】：计算机网络的发达给人们提供了更多的资讯和更加快捷的联系方式,但与此同时,越来越多的网上侵权案件也给我们传统的司法制度提出了一系列新的问题,其中网络侵权案件的民事诉讼管辖便是突出问题之一。依照我国现行法律规定,因侵权行为(包括一般侵权案件和网络侵权案件)提起的诉讼,只能由侵权行为地法院或者被告住所地法院管辖,但网络侵权纠纷具有不同于一般侵权纠纷的特殊性:遭受网络侵权的原告往往难以确定实施网上侵权行为被告的住所地以及侵权行为地点,原告处于起诉困难的窘境。本文认为,应当从计算机网络的特点出发,对传统管辖理论和网络管辖新理论、网络案件侵权行为地以及外国相关的理论进行梳理,尤其是应借鉴美国的"长臂管辖权"理论。原告住所地人民法院应当成为网络侵权案件的管辖权法院之一,这可以给原告更大程度的法院管辖选择权,从而在司法实践中有效地解决网络侵权案件原告"起诉难"问题。
[Abstract]:The development of computer network has provided people with more information and faster contact methods, but at the same time, more and more online infringement cases have raised a series of new problems for our traditional judicial system. One of the outstanding problems is the jurisdiction of civil action in network tort cases. According to the current laws of our country, lawsuits brought as a result of tort acts (including general infringement cases and network infringement cases) can only be under the jurisdiction of the court of the place where the infringing act is committed or the court where the defendant is domiciled. However, the network tort dispute is different from the common tort dispute: the plaintiff who suffers from the network infringement is often difficult to determine the place of residence and the place of the infringement of the defendant, and the plaintiff is in a difficult situation of prosecution. This paper holds that the traditional jurisdiction theory and the new network jurisdiction theory, as well as the related theories of the infringing acts of network cases and foreign countries should be combed from the characteristics of computer network, especially the "long arm jurisdiction" theory of the United States should be used for reference. The people's court in the place of the plaintiff's domicile should be one of the jurisdiction courts in the network infringement cases, which can give the plaintiff the right to choose the jurisdiction of the court to a greater extent, so as to effectively solve the problem of the plaintiff's "hard to sue" in the judicial practice.
【作者单位】：上海大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.4;D925.1;D997

【参考文献】