ECFA框架下海峡两岸私法冲突问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 22:05

本文选题：ECFA + 区际法律冲突　；参考：《大连海事大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：2010年6月29日,海峡两岸正式签订了《海峡两岸经济合作框架协议》(即ECFA), ECFA的最终签署是两岸关系和平发展的一个重要里程碑。自上世纪40年代开始,由于特殊的历史原因,两岸交往被人为隔绝。直到上世纪70年代末,在大陆政府的不懈努力下,海峡两岸之间的交往,从无到有,日益密切。但是由于两岸社会制度、法律制度的不同,这必然会导致大量民商事法律冲突的产生。ECFA的签署使两岸经贸往来进一步深化,因此探讨海峡两岸的民商事法律冲突的解决具有极其重要的意义。笔者试图从国际私法角度找到一条有效解决现阶段两岸民商事法律冲突的途径。本为在写作上分为四部分：第一部分对ECFA的签署背景、必要性以及发展前景进行简单介绍,通过类比CEPA(即“关于建立更紧密经贸关系的安排”)和FTA(即“自由贸易协定”)明确界定了ECFA的法律属性,即在“一个中国”前提下的特殊国内法律安排。第二部分着重对海峡两岸私法冲突的性质进行界定。通过对海峡两岸私法冲突产生原因及性质进行分析,阐明海峡两岸私法冲突实际上是特殊的区际法律冲突。第三部分则分节探讨了ECFA框架下海峡两岸在旅游、空运直航、知识产权保护以及商业银行法律制度这四个领域的私法冲突问题,说明了两岸私法冲突问题亟待解决。最后一部分,通过研究当前各多法域国家解决区际法律冲突所采取的方式,结合我国海峡两岸私法冲突的特殊性,提出解决海峡两岸私法冲突的切实有效方法。目前解决海峡两岸私法冲突的方法有很多,但是究竟应该采取何种方法,应当结合海峡来两岸私法冲突的特点。在“一个中国”、“一国两制”的前提下,笔者认为解决海峡两岸私法冲突的方法是：一是签署国际私法协议；二是类推适用各自国际私法。
[Abstract]:On June 29, 2010, the two sides of the Taiwan Strait formally signed the Framework Agreement on Economic Cooperation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The final signing of the ECFA is an important milestone in the peaceful development of cross-strait relations. Since the 1940s, due to special historical reasons, cross-strait exchanges have been artificially isolated. Until the late 1970s, with the unremitting efforts of the mainland government, the exchanges between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait grew closer from scratch. However, due to the different social systems and legal systems across the Taiwan Strait, this will inevitably lead to the emergence of a large number of conflicts of civil and commercial laws. The signing of ECFA will further deepen cross-strait economic and trade exchanges. Therefore, it is of great significance to discuss the conflict of civil and commercial laws between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The author tries to find an effective way to solve the conflict of civil and commercial laws between the two sides of the strait from the angle of private international law. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the background, necessity and development prospect of ECFA. By analogy with CEPA (the CEPA on the Establishment of closer Economic Partnership) and FTAs (Free Trade Agreement), the legal attributes of the ECFA are clearly defined, that is, special domestic legal arrangements under the premise of "one China". The second part focuses on defining the nature of the conflict between the two sides of the strait. Based on the analysis of the causes and nature of the conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, this paper expounds that the conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is actually a special interregional conflict of laws. The third part discusses the conflict of private law between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait in the four fields of tourism, direct air transportation, intellectual property protection and the legal system of commercial banks under the framework of ECFA, which shows that the conflict of private law between the two sides of the strait should be solved urgently. In the last part, the author puts forward the effective method to solve the conflict of private law between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait by studying the ways adopted by the countries in various jurisdictions to solve the conflict of laws between the two regions, and combining with the particularity of the conflict of private law between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. There are many ways to resolve the conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, but what methods should be adopted, which should be combined with the characteristics of the conflict between the two sides of the strait. Under the premise of "one China" and "one country, two systems", the author thinks that the solution to the conflict of private law between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is as follows: first, signing an agreement on private international law; secondly, applying their private international law by analogy.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923;D997

【参考文献】