能否在羁押场所监听律师会见——基于欧洲人权法院R.E诉英国一案的分析

发布时间：2018-04-28 00:06

本文选题：会见 + 有效辩护　；参考：《河北法学》2017年11期

【摘要】：传统上,欧洲人权法院认为被追诉人能够与律师秘密交流是获得有效律师帮助的前提,但在例外情形下可以对这一权利加以限制。在此问题上,欧洲人权法院的判例经历了整体平衡向建立明确规则的转变。R.E.诉英国一案将先前确立的关于窃听案件的标准应用到监听律师会见的情形,监听会见的适用应当限于特殊的犯罪但不必限定对象,应当有明确的期限,而对监听所获的信息,应当设置明确的检验、使用、保存、传播和销毁的规定。R.E.一案对我国的借鉴意义在于,在"三类案件"中有条件地允许监听律师会见,优于普遍拒绝会见。
[Abstract]:Traditionally, the European Court of Human Rights has held that the ability of the accused to communicate confidentially with counsel is a prerequisite for obtaining the assistance of an effective lawyer, but this right can be restricted in exceptional circumstances. In this regard, the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights has undergone a shift from overall balance to the establishment of clear rules. R. E. The case against the United Kingdom applied the previously established standards on wiretapping cases to the case of a listening lawyer's meeting, the application of which should be limited to a special crime but not limited to the object, there should be a clear period of time, and there should be a clear period of time to monitor the information obtained from the interception. Clear rules for inspection, use, preservation, dissemination and destruction shall be established. R. E. The reference meaning of one case to our country lies in the conditional permission of listening lawyer to meet in "three kinds of cases", which is superior to general refusal to meet.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：2015年国家社科基金项目《认罪认罚从宽实施程序研究》(15BFX072) 重庆市2016年研究生科研创新项目《在押未决犯的会见交流权》(CYB16085) 西南政法大学2015年研究生科研创新计划《论我国有效辩护标准之构建》(XZYJS2015004) 国家留学基金委资助
【分类号】：D998.2

【相似文献】