欧盟反倾销法公共利益条款研究

发布时间：2018-04-29 17:25

本文选题：反倾销措施 + 公共利益　；参考：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：反倾销措施是世贸组织给予各成员方应对外国产品低价冲击的一种合法有效手段。根据世贸组织《反倾销协议》的规定,当世贸组织成员方国内产业受到倾销产品冲击造成国内产业损害、损害威胁或对建立相关产业造成实质阻碍时,成员方可以对倾销产品实施以征收反倾销税为代表的反倾销措施。反倾销措施有力的回应了外国产品对本国市场的低价冲击,降低了进口产品本国相关产业发展的威胁,为本国市场及其产业提供了切实有效的保护。反倾销法中公共利益条款的设置试图通过对各种利益的比较得出最优的决策方案。世贸组织及其成员方特别是欧共体(欧盟)的反倾销立法中均可以发现公共利益条款的身影。而欧盟在进行反倾销调查中有专门的法律规范进行公共利益审查,详实的法律依据、完善的法律程序对全面评估公共利益并以评估的结果作为反倾销措施的依据值得我们学习。尽管在我国的反倾销法律中也有公共利益条款的规定,但其太过宽泛缺乏操作性,同时在我国对外贸易往来中针对我国产品发起的反倾销调查甚嚣尘上,如何应对外国倾销产品对我国的冲击,以及怎样应对外国对我国出口产品的反倾销措施,是当今全球化背景下摆在我国面前的一个课题。有鉴于此,本论文试图通过分析欧共体(欧盟)在反倾销立法及实践中对公共利益的规定和运用,构建我国自主的反倾销公共利益条款,同时通过比较分析,也为我国应对国外针对我国产品的反倾销措施提供些许建议。本文除引言和结语外共分为四个部分。第一部分“反倾销法中规定公共利益条款的必要性”,本部分着重分析反倾销法在保护国内产业利益方面的积极作用与反倾销法本身体现出的不足,并指出国家整体利益最大化应是反倾销立法及实践的出发点和归宿,阐明在反倾销立法及实践中进行公共利益评估的必要性。第二部分“欧盟反倾销法中有关公共利益问题的实体因素”,本部分详细分析欧盟在反倾销立法及实践中关于公共利益的实体规定,以典型案例如欧盟硅铁复审案作为支撑阐述欧盟反倾销立法及实践中如何确定产品市场与竞争结构,怎样评估采取的反倾销措施对各利益关联方如欧盟产业、产品的下游用户、产品进口商及最终消费者的利益影响以及对市场竞争结构可能产生的影响,并根据这些评估作为最终决定征收反倾销税的依据。第三部分“欧盟反倾销法中有关公共利益问题的程序设计”,重在分析欧盟反倾销立法及实践中进行公共利益调查的程序规定,本部分突出强调了欧盟公共利益审查中利益关联方的确定及这些利益关联方所享有的程序性权利以及进行公共利益审查的具体情形。第四部分“欧盟反倾销法中公共利益条款对我国反倾销立法及实践的借鉴”,本部分首先分析了我国在反倾销立法及实践中公共利益方面存在的不足,提出借鉴欧盟在公共利益立法及实践方面的成熟经验来完善我国反倾销法的建议,同时我国在对外反倾销实践中也应加强对公共利益方面的审查,努力做到国家整体利益、长远利益的最大化。
[Abstract]:Anti-dumping measures are a legitimate and effective means given by the WTO to the low price shocks of foreign products. According to the WTO < Anti-dumping Agreement >, when the domestic industries of WTO members are affected by the impact of the dumping products, the threat of damage or the substantial obstacles to the establishment of the related industries, the WTO members will have a substantial impediment to the establishment of the related industries. The anti dumping measures can effectively respond to the low price impact of foreign products on the domestic market, reduce the threat to the development of domestic related industries and provide effective protection for the domestic market and its industry.
The provision of public interest in the anti dumping law tries to get the best decision by comparing various interests. The WTO and its members, especially the European Community (EU), can find the figure of the public interest clause in the anti-dumping legislation of the European Community (EU). The EU has a special legal norm for public interest in the anti-dumping investigation. It is worth learning for us to learn from the benefit review, the detailed legal basis and the perfect legal procedure for comprehensive assessment of the public interest and the results of the evaluation as an antidumping measure. Although there are also the provisions of the public interest clause in our anti-dumping law, it is too broad and lacking in exercise, at the same time, it is aimed at me in the foreign trade of our country. The anti-dumping investigation launched by the national products is very crowded. How to deal with the impact of foreign dumping products on our country and how to deal with the anti-dumping measures of foreign products to our country are a subject facing our country in the background of globalization today. In practice, the provisions and applications of public interests are used to build our own anti dumping public interest clauses. At the same time, through comparative analysis, some suggestions are provided for our country to deal with anti-dumping measures against China's products abroad.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into four parts.
The first part, "the necessity of the provision of public interest in the antidumping law", this part focuses on the analysis of the positive role of the antidumping law in protecting the domestic industrial interests and the shortcomings of the anti-dumping law itself, and points out that the maximum of the country's overall interests should be the starting point and the end of the anti-dumping legislation and practice, and clarifies the Antidumping of the anti-dumping law. The necessity of public interest assessment in legislation and practice.
The second part is "the entity factor of the issue of public interest in the EU anti-dumping law". This part analyzes the substantive provisions concerning the public interests in the anti-dumping legislation and practice in the EU. The typical case, such as the EU ferrosilicon complex review, illustrates how to determine the product market and competition structure in the EU anti-dumping legislation and practice. How to assess the impact of anti-dumping measures on interest related parties such as the EU industry, downstream users of products, product importers and final consumers, as well as the possible impact on the market competition structure, and based on these assessments as the basis for the final decision to levy anti-dumping duties.
The third part, "the procedural design of the issue of public interest in the EU anti-dumping law", focuses on the procedural provisions of the investigation of public interests in the EU anti-dumping legislation and practice. This part highlights the determination of the interest related parties in the EU public interest review and the procedural rights enjoyed by these interest related parties and the progress of the EU's public interest review. The specific circumstances of the review of public interest.
The fourth part is "the reference of the public interest clause in the EU anti dumping law on our anti-dumping legislation and practice". This part first analyzes the shortcomings of our country's public interests in the anti-dumping legislation and practice, and proposes to draw on the European Union's mature experience in the public interest legislation and practice to improve our anti-dumping law. At the same time, China should strengthen the examination of public interest in the practice of foreign anti-dumping, and strive to maximize the overall interests of the country and the long-term interests.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】