论中国与菲律宾南海诸岛争端
发布时间:2018-05-01 11:23
本文选题:南海诸岛 + U形线 ; 参考:《山东大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:众所周知,南海诸岛是我国的南部海疆,我国人民发现南海诸岛已将近二千年之久,南海诸岛对我国具有不言而喻的重要的经济意义和战略意义。然而,随着20世纪60年代末70年代初探测到南中国海海底蕴藏着丰富的油气资源,南中国海的经济价值不断提升。经济资源的丰富和战略地位的重要,引起了一些南海周边国家的强烈兴趣。尤其是2009年1月28日,菲律宾参议院通过2699号法案即“菲律宾群岛领海基线议案”,将南沙群岛中的部分岛屿和黄岩岛划为了菲律宾领土,严重的影响了中国与菲律宾两国关系的健康发展。 本文分四部门来论述中国与菲律宾南海诸岛的争端:第一部分是简要的概述中国与菲律宾南海诸岛争端的由来与现状;第二部分是中国与菲律宾关于争议的南海诸岛主权归属的法律分析,通过对菲律宾关于南海诸岛的主权主张不符合国际法的论证和中国对南海诸岛拥有主权依据的分析,进一步证明南海诸岛是我国的领土。第三部分是概述中国在与菲律宾在南海诸岛争端上所面临的困境,这部分将重点放在了我国所面临的四个方面的困难:南海九段线的尴尬地位,我国海洋立法的落后,“搁置争议,共同开发”困境重重和我国利用法律手段解决南海问题能力较差以及域外大国介入,使得南海问题呈现复杂化趋势。第四部分是突破中国与菲律宾南海诸岛争端所临困境的对策,通过明确中国南海海洋权益的范围;健全和完善我国海洋法律体系;利用法律手段,和平解决南海诸岛的争端问题;以及坚持我国主权立场,积极应对争端的国际化趋势的对策,促进南海问题的及时解决。
[Abstract]:As we all know, the South China Sea Islands are the southern sea frontier of our country. Our people have discovered the South China Sea Islands for nearly two thousand years, the South China Sea Islands have the self-evident important economic and strategic significance to our country. However, with the detection of abundant oil and gas resources in the seabed of the South China Sea in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the economic value of the South China Sea has been rising. The abundance of economic resources and the importance of strategic position have aroused the strong interest of some countries around the South China Sea. In particular, on 28 January 2009, the Philippine Senate passed Act 2699, the baseline Bill for the Territorial Sea of the Philippine Islands, which classifies some of the islands in the Spratly Islands and Huangyan Island as Philippine territory, This has seriously affected the healthy development of relations between China and the Philippines. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the dispute between China and the South China Sea islands in the Philippines: the first part is a brief overview of the origin and status quo of the dispute between China and the Philippines South China Sea Islands; The second part is the legal analysis of the sovereignty of the disputed South China Sea islands between China and the Philippines, through the argument that the Philippines' claim on the South China Sea Islands is not in accordance with international law and the analysis of the basis of China's sovereignty over the South China Sea Islands. Further proof that the South China Sea islands are our territory. The third part is an overview of the difficulties that China and the Philippines face in the dispute over the South China Sea Islands. This part focuses on the four difficulties that China faces: the embarrassing position of the South China Sea Nine Duan Line, the backwardness of China's maritime legislation. The difficulties of "shelving disputes and developing jointly", the poor ability of China to solve the South China Sea problem by legal means and the intervention of foreign powers make the South China Sea issue more complicated. The fourth part is to break through the dilemma of the dispute between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea Islands dispute, through clear the scope of China's maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea; improve and improve our maritime legal system; use legal means, To resolve the dispute of the South China Sea Islands peacefully, and to adhere to the sovereignty position of our country, to actively deal with the internationalization trend of the dispute, and to promote the timely settlement of the South China Sea problem.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D993.5;D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 郭渊;;从“先占”看中国对南沙群岛的主权[J];北方法学;2007年03期
2 郭渊;;海洋权益与海洋秩序的构建[J];厦门大学法律评论;2005年02期
3 王虎华;论我国和平解决国际争端的理论与实践[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年04期
4 王恒杰;;西沙群岛的考古调查[J];考古;1992年09期
5 赵海峰;荣吉平;;国际法院——成就与挑战[J];人民司法;2005年04期
6 夏道成;樊翠香;马云;;中菲“南中国海”争端的历史考察暨解决趋向的特征[J];通化师范学院学报;2008年01期
7 全永波;;构建我国海洋立法体系的思考[J];燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年04期
,本文编号:1829143
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1829143.html