论欧盟境内跨界破产管辖权的分配

发布时间：2018-05-03 06:36

本文选题：破产域外效力 + 管辖权分配制度　；参考：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：现代社会在迅猛发展的科学技术和社会生产力的不断推动下,进入了一个全球经济一体化进一步纵深发展的时代。然而,在经济全球化带动各国经济和全球经济飞速发展的同时,随着跨界贸易和投资的日益频繁,跨界破产案件日益增多。尤其是自2008年全球金融危机爆发以来,全球经济进入大萧条时期,一大批知名跨国企业遭受重创,纷纷不得已宣告破产,跨界破产案件因此俱增,跨界破产问题也因此被推上了风口浪尖。跨界破产案件首先需要解决的问题就是管辖权的分配问题,因为跨界破产案件的管辖权是启动跨界破产程序的前提,也是跨界破产程序启动后得以顺利开展的重要保障,还是跨界破产程序能够得到相关国家承认与协助的关键所在。针对跨界破产案件的管辖权,2002年5月31日生效的《欧盟破产程序规则》建立了一套比较完善的分配制度,该制度在欧盟境内得到了广泛应用,体现出无可比拟的优越性,当然也不可避免地在一些跨界破产案件中彰显出某些局限性,这些优越性和局限性都是各国尤其是我国的跨界破产管辖权分配立法所应借鉴的。因此,研究欧盟境内跨界破产管辖权的分配制度具有十分重要的意义。本文采用立法研究与案例分析相结合的方法,对欧盟境内跨界破产的管辖权分配制度进行了深入探讨,分析了其优越性和局限性,从而为我国相关立法制度的建立和完善提供借鉴,以弥补我国在跨界破产管辖权分配制度方面的立法空白。具体而言,本文在整体结构上分为引言、正文和结论三部分,其中,正文部分共分四章:第一章首先介绍了跨界破产的概念和内容,同时论述了跨界破产管辖权分配的重要性,然后通过分析跨界破产域外效力理论的历史演进,指出欧盟境内跨界破产管辖权分配制度的理论基础是符合当代发展趋势的修正普及主义;第二章是对欧盟境内跨界破产管辖权分配制度的立法研究和司法研究,该章首先介绍了欧盟境内跨界破产管辖权分配的统一立法,即《欧盟破产程序规则》的相关规定,然后对迄今为止欧盟历史上规模最大的跨界破产案件即Parmalat集团公司破产案进行了介绍和分析;第三章在第二章的基础上,着重分析了欧盟境内跨界破产管辖权分配制度的核心概念,即“债务人主要利益中心”,该章通过对“债务人主要利益中心”现有确定标准及其不确定性的分析,对其概念内涵、确定标准以及确定方法的进一步完善提出了建议;第四章首先对我国跨界破产管辖权分配的立法现状进行考察,发现了我国在这一方面的立法空白,进而参考欧盟境内跨界破产管辖权分配制度的优越性和局限性,对我国跨界破产管辖权分配制度的建立和完善提出了自己的建议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology and the continuous promotion of social productive forces, modern society has entered an era of further development of global economic integration. However, with the rapid development of economy and global economy driven by economic globalization, with the increasing frequency of cross-border trade and investment, cross-border bankruptcy cases are increasing day by day. Especially since the outbreak of the global financial crisis in 2008, the global economy has entered a period of Great Depression, a large number of well-known multinational enterprises have suffered heavy losses, have had to declare bankruptcy, cross-border bankruptcy cases have increased. The problem of cross-border bankruptcy has also been pushed to the forefront of the storm. The first problem to be solved in cross-border insolvency cases is the allocation of jurisdiction, because the jurisdiction of cross-border insolvency cases is the prerequisite for the commencement of cross-border insolvency proceedings and an important guarantee for the smooth development of cross-border insolvency proceedings after the commencement of cross-border insolvency proceedings. Is also the key to the cross-border insolvency proceedings can be recognized and assisted by the relevant States. In view of the jurisdiction of cross-border bankruptcy cases, the EU bankruptcy procedure rules, which came into effect on May 31, 2002, have established a relatively perfect distribution system, which has been widely used in the European Union and has shown unparalleled superiority. Of course, it is inevitable to show some limitations in some cross-border bankruptcy cases. These advantages and limitations should be used for reference by all countries, especially our country's legislation on the distribution of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in the EU. In this paper, the method of combining legislative research with case analysis is used to probe into the jurisdiction distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy in the European Union, and its advantages and limitations are analyzed. In order to provide reference for the establishment and perfection of relevant legislative system in our country, in order to make up for the legislative gaps in the distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in our country. Specifically, the whole structure of this paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. Among them, the text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter introduces the concept and content of cross-border bankruptcy, and discusses the importance of the distribution of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction. Then by analyzing the historical evolution of the theory of extraterritorial effect of cross-border bankruptcy, it is pointed out that the theoretical basis of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction distribution system in the EU is the revised populism in line with the contemporary development trend. The second chapter is the legislative research and judicial research on the distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in the European Union. This chapter first introduces the uniform legislation on the distribution of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in the European Union, that is, the relevant provisions of the rules on bankruptcy procedure of the European Union. Then it introduces and analyzes the largest cross-border bankruptcy case in the history of the European Union, that is, the bankruptcy case of Parmalat Group Company. Chapter three is based on the second chapter. Focusing on the analysis of the core concept of the distribution system of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in the European Union, that is, "centre of main interests of the debtor", through an analysis of the existing criteria for the determination of "centre of main interests of the debtor" and its uncertainty, Some suggestions are put forward on the connotation of the concept, the standard of determination and the further improvement of the method. Chapter four first investigates the current situation of legislation on the distribution of jurisdiction over cross-border bankruptcy in China, and finds the legislative gaps in this respect in our country. Furthermore, referring to the advantages and limitations of the cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction distribution system in the EU, the author puts forward some suggestions for the establishment and improvement of the cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction distribution system in China.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996

【参考文献】