欧盟反倾销启动机制研究

发布时间：2018-05-04 14:35

本文选题：反倾销启动机制 + 应申诉立案启动　；参考：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：欧盟是对华反倾销最厉害的地区,世界上第一例对华反倾销案件就是1979年欧盟发起的对我国出口的糖精钠进行的反倾销调查。在此后的三十多年里,欧盟是我国最主要的贸易伙伴之一,同时也是对我国产品发起反倾销调查和采取反倾销措施的数量也是最多的。最近几年,欧盟对我国发起的反倾销案件不断增多,反倾销的对象也有了扩大的趋势:由过去主要以低附加值的轻纺、机电等产品作为反倾销调查的对象,发展到现在高新技术产品也频频被发起反倾销调查,这种状况在很大程度上影响了我国出口增长的稳定性。反倾销启动机制作为整个反倾销程序中首要的环节也是最重要的环节,研究欧盟反倾销程序的启动方式,欧盟反倾销启动程序的特点以及我国如何利用欧盟反倾销启动机制的规定和特点有效避免反倾销程序的启动具有十分重要的现实意义。基于目前欧盟对我国频繁发起反倾销调查的严重形势,本文选取欧盟反倾销启动机制的这一程序法角度,全面介绍和分析欧盟反倾销启动机制的相关规定和特点,以欧盟委员会进行反倾销立案必须构成有效申诉的条件作为主突破口,找寻我国企业频频引致欧盟对华反倾销程序启动及绝大部分被采取反倾销措施的原因,并探讨中国政府、行业协会及企业在应对欧盟对华反倾销程序中如何利用有效申诉的条件这一突破口,采取措施阻止欧盟相关产业的申诉构成有效申诉,从而避免进入反倾销的实质审查阶段,并达到避免被采取反倾销措施的后果。全文分为四章。第一部分是导言,即问题的提出,从分析欧盟对华反倾销的态势,阐述了研究欧盟反倾销启动机制所具有的理论和现实意义。第一章,对整个反倾销启动机制进行了介绍和探讨,按照反倾销机构设置,反倾销启动机制分为单轨制、双轨制、准双轨制和多轨制四种形式。按照启动方式又可以分为两种形式。第二章详细介绍和分析了欧盟反倾销启动机制的规定和特点。应申诉立案是欧盟最主要的反倾销启动方式,而反倾销机构自行启动则是其有效补充方式。第三章结合案例分析了我国企业频频引发欧盟反倾销程序启动的原因,为第四部分提出应对策略打下基础,指出经济结构不合理、恶性竞争、企业配合不力等问题是造成我国企业屡屡引致欧盟反倾销调查程序启动和在遭受反倾销后大部分被采取反倾销措施的主要原因。第四章在对反倾销启动机制的规定和特点进行分析的基础上,结合我国企业频频引发欧盟反倾销启动的原因,从避免反倾销调查程序的启动角度谈我国政府、企业和行业协会在应对和防范欧盟对华反倾销的对策。此部分是本文的落脚点。
[Abstract]:The European Union (EU) is the most serious antidumping region against China. The first anti-dumping case against China in the world is the anti-dumping investigation initiated by the EU against China's exports of saccharin sodium in 1979. In the following thirty years, the EU is one of the most important trading partners of our country, and it is also the largest number of anti-dumping investigations and antidumping measures against our products. In recent years, the European Union has initiated more and more anti-dumping cases against China, and the targets of anti-dumping have also been expanded. In the past, the EU mainly used low-value-added textile, electromechanical and other products as the object of anti-dumping investigations. The development of high and new technology products has been frequently initiated anti-dumping investigations, which greatly affected the stability of China's export growth. As the first and most important link in the whole anti-dumping proceedings, the anti-dumping initiation mechanism is also the most important link. It is of great practical significance for China to make use of the regulations and characteristics of EU anti-dumping initiation mechanism to avoid the initiation of anti-dumping procedure. Based on the serious situation that the EU frequently initiated anti-dumping investigations against China, this paper selects the procedural law angle of EU anti-dumping initiation mechanism, and comprehensively introduces and analyzes the relevant regulations and characteristics of EU anti-dumping initiation mechanism. Taking the condition that the European Commission must form an effective complaint to file an anti-dumping case as the main breakthrough point, to find out why Chinese enterprises frequently led to the initiation of the EU anti-dumping proceedings against China and most of the anti-dumping measures taken by the EU, and to probe into the Chinese government. Trade associations and enterprises in dealing with the EU anti-dumping proceedings against China how to make use of the conditions of effective complaints, take measures to prevent EU related industries from making effective complaints, thus avoiding entering the stage of substantive review of anti-dumping. And to avoid the consequences of anti-dumping measures. The full text is divided into four chapters. The first part is the introduction, that is, the question put forward, from the analysis of the situation of EU anti-dumping against China, the paper expounds the theoretical and practical significance of the study of EU anti-dumping initiation mechanism. The first chapter introduces and discusses the whole mechanism of anti-dumping initiation. According to the mechanism of anti-dumping, the mechanism can be divided into four forms: monorail system, dual-track system, quasi-dual-track system and multi-track system. According to the startup mode can be divided into two forms. The second chapter introduces and analyzes the regulations and characteristics of EU anti-dumping initiation mechanism in detail. Filing a complaint is the most important way to start anti-dumping in EU, and self-initiation of anti-dumping agency is an effective supplementary way. The third chapter analyzes the reasons why Chinese enterprises frequently start the EU anti-dumping procedure, lays the foundation for the fourth part, and points out that the economic structure is unreasonable, and the vicious competition. The lack of cooperation among enterprises is the main reason why Chinese enterprises often lead to the initiation of anti-dumping investigation procedure in EU and the antidumping measures taken by most of them after being subjected to antidumping. On the basis of the analysis of the regulations and characteristics of anti-dumping initiation mechanism, the fourth chapter discusses the Chinese government from the angle of avoiding the initiation of anti-dumping investigation procedure, combining with the reasons why Chinese enterprises frequently trigger the EU anti-dumping initiation. Enterprises and trade associations are responding to and preventing EU anti-dumping measures against China. This part is the foothold of this article.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1;F752.02

【参考文献】