后TRIPs时代传统资源权与知识产权的冲突与协调

发布时间：2018-05-04 14:48

本文选题：传统资源 + 传统资源权　；参考：《兰州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：当代知识产权国际保护的变革面临着崭新制度的突破,如传统知识、遗传资源保护制度。在保护今天的各种智力创作与创造之“流”时,人们在相当长的时间里忽略了对它们的“源”的传统资源的保护,发达国家与发展中国家实际上在“源”上的智力成果与在“流”上的智力成果的冲突日益明显。然而,随着国际贸易不断的发展,面对上述冲突,人们日益认识到保护传统资源的重要性,但由于国际社会对传统资源的概念界定、本质分析等研究缺乏共识,因此关于对“传统资源”的保护对象、保护具体内容,相关具体程序等问题达成基本的一致认识。基于这一现状,笔者试图从“传统资源”入手,通过对传统资源、传统资源权、知识产权的概念、特性、本质的分析,得出造成上述两者冲突的原因所在,并深入分析冲突的实质,最终提出协调传统资源权与知识产权的更充分的方案。通过分析,笔者主要得出以下两个结论：第一,传统资源权不属于知识产权,而是一种独立于现行知识产权制度的一种权利体系。第二,传统资源权属于人权的一种,其同知识产权的冲突,实质上为人权与知识产权的冲突。通过上述两个结论,笔者认为,传统资源权概念的提出,是完全突破了现行的知识产权模式的一种全新的术语,其不再仅仅局限于知识产权的体系中,而是从人权的高度,来对传统资源的保护提供另外一种更全面的保护思路。
[Abstract]:The contemporary international protection of intellectual property rights is faced with a new system of breakthrough, such as traditional knowledge, genetic resources protection system. In protecting the "flow" of today's intellectual creation and creation, people have for quite a long time neglected the protection of their "source" of traditional resources. The conflict between developed and developing countries' intellectual achievements in "source" and "flow" is becoming more and more obvious. However, with the continuous development of international trade, in the face of these conflicts, people are increasingly aware of the importance of protecting traditional resources. However, there is a lack of consensus in the international community on the conceptual definition of traditional resources and essential analysis. Therefore, the basic consensus is reached on the protection object, the concrete content and the relevant concrete procedure of the "traditional resources". Based on this situation, the author tries to start with "traditional resources", through the analysis of the concept, characteristics and essence of traditional resources, traditional resource rights, intellectual property rights, the reasons for the conflict between the two are obtained. The essence of the conflict is analyzed in depth, and a more sufficient scheme to coordinate traditional resource rights and intellectual property rights is put forward. Through analysis, the author draws the following two conclusions: first, the traditional resource rights are not intellectual property rights, but an independent of the current intellectual property system of a right system. Second, the traditional resource right belongs to one kind of human rights, its conflict with intellectual property rights is essentially the conflict between human rights and intellectual property rights. Through the above two conclusions, the author thinks that the concept of traditional resource right is a completely new term that breaks through the current intellectual property model, which is not only confined to the system of intellectual property, but also from the height of human rights. To provide a more comprehensive approach to the protection of traditional resources.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.1

【参考文献】