作为国际正犯和共犯的军事长官刑事责任

发布时间：2018-05-09 07:38

  本文选题：国际刑法 + 正犯　； 参考：《哈尔滨工业大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：作为国际刑法研究对象的国际犯罪,通常是组织严密、体系健全、参与者众的。由于国际犯罪的有组织性,在犯罪中起到幕后决定作用的主要责任人经常是处于组织体顶端的军事长官。研究作为正犯和共犯的军事长官刑事责任,不仅可以使军事长官的各种罪行得到追诉,同时梳理了共犯的参与形态问题,也促进了我国共犯理论的发展,以期为我国刑事法律体系的完善做出贡献。在研究军事长官在国际犯罪中所应承担的责任之前,首先对国内外刑法学界对于共犯体系的学说进行了学理溯源,将德国学者Roxin的犯罪事实支配理论作为研究的起点,确定以符合国际潮流的正犯共犯二元区分制责任模式作为分析军事长官责任的前提,共犯参与形态划分为正犯模式与共犯模式。其次,结合国际刑事法院《罗马规约》中对正犯与共犯的分类以及国际刑事司法审判实践来分析军事长官作为各种角色所应当承担的责任,包括作为直接正犯、间接正犯以及共同正犯的正犯责任,和作为教唆犯、帮助犯与支助犯的共犯责任,还讨论了具有特殊性的即共犯正犯化的军事长官责任。最后,通过对以上内容的分析总结,借鉴德国和国际上关于共同犯罪理论的学理与立法,来探讨我国刑法对二元区分模式的接纳程度与引入可能性,以期为我国刑事法律体系中共犯体系的完善带来一些启示,并对如黑社会性质的组织犯罪提供一个可行的归责模式。将国际刑事立法与军事长官的各项刑事责任紧密联系,对共同犯罪的参与形态进行深入浅出的分析。通过视察我国是否有正犯共犯二元区分模式成长的土壤,发现这种共犯参与形态与我国刑事法律体系有较好的契合度,如果引入这一模式对解决诸如黑社会性质的组织犯罪等刑法问题有战略性意义。
[Abstract]:As the object of international criminal law research, international crime is usually well-organized, sound system and numerous participants. Because of the organized nature of international crime, the chief responsible person who plays a decisive role in the crime is often the military commander at the top of the organization. The study of the criminal responsibility of military officers as principal and accomplices can not only lead to the prosecution of all kinds of crimes committed by military officers, but also comb the participation pattern of accomplices and promote the development of the theory of accomplices in our country. In order to contribute to the perfection of our criminal law system. Before studying the responsibility of military officers in international crimes, this paper firstly traces the theoretical origin of the theory of accomplice system in domestic and foreign criminal law circles, taking the theory of criminal fact domination of German scholar Roxin as the starting point of the research. It is determined that the dualistic differentiated liability model of accomplice in accordance with the international trend is the premise of the analysis of the responsibility of military officers, and the pattern of accomplice participation is divided into the pattern of principal offender and the mode of accomplice. Secondly, in the light of the classification of principal and accomplices in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the practice of international criminal justice, the responsibilities of military officers as various actors, including direct perpetrators, are analyzed. The responsibility of indirect principal offender and joint principal offender, and the accomplice responsibility of aiding and supporting crime as abettor, and the responsibility of military chief with particularity of accomplice principal offender are also discussed. Finally, through the analysis and summary of the above contents, draw lessons from the theory of joint crime in Germany and the international academic theory and legislation, to explore the degree of acceptance and the possibility of introduction of dual differentiation model in criminal law of our country. In order to bring some enlightenment to the perfection of the accomplice system in the criminal law system of our country, and provide a feasible imputation mode for the organized crime such as the underworld. The international criminal legislation is closely linked with the criminal responsibility of military officers, and the participating form of joint crime is analyzed. By inspecting the soil of whether there is a dual differentiation model of principal offender accomplice in our country, it is found that this pattern of accomplice participation has a good agreement with the criminal law system of our country. If this model is introduced, it is of strategic significance to solve criminal law problems such as organized crime.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D997.9
，

本文编号：1865149