航运融资中的航空器抵押权研究

发布时间：2018-05-09 11:23

本文选题：航空器 + 抵押权　；参考：《法学杂志》2010年01期

【摘要】：航空器抵押权的立法反映了航运融资的需要。航空器抵押权的性质是动产抵押还是不动产抵押,主要取决于立法选择。航空器抵押权的标的物具有合成性,包括航空器构架、发动机、螺旋桨、无线电设备和其他一切为了在航空器上使用的无论安装于其上或暂时拆离的物品,其中某些物品可单独设定抵押权,因而不能完全适用主物与从物的附加和分割原则。各国航空器抵押权的公示方法有登记、明认打刻、备案的差异,但各有利弊,立法的选择应以最大化地减少权力机关的服务和干预为理念,因为多一点服务就会造成交易的负担。航空器抵押权的公示效力以登记对抗力为特征,实行航空器抵押权的基础关系(协议)与物权变动的效力的区分有利于促进融资的发展。
[Abstract]:The legislation of aircraft mortgage reflects the need of shipping financing. Whether the nature of aircraft mortgage is chattel mortgage or immovable property mortgage mainly depends on the choice of legislation. The subject matter of an aircraft mortgage shall be of synthetic character, including the aircraft frame, engine, propeller, radio equipment and all other articles, whether mounted or temporarily removed, for the purpose of being used on board the aircraft, Some of them can be hypothesized separately, so they can not be fully applied to the principle of attachment and partitioning between principal and subordinate objects. The public display methods of aircraft mortgage rights in various countries are different in terms of registration, recognition, record keeping, but they have their own advantages and disadvantages. The choice of legislation should be based on the idea of maximizing the service and interference of power organs. Because a little more service will create a transaction burden. The publicizing effect of aircraft mortgage is characterized by the register antagonism. The distinction between the basic relationship (agreement) of aircraft mortgage and the effect of the change of real right is helpful to promote the development of financing.
【作者单位】：中国民航大学法学院;山东省青岛市黄岛区人民检察院;
【基金】：作者主持的中国民航大学科研项目成果,项目编号:09CAUC-HO1 天津市哲学社会科学研究规划资助项目的阶段性成果(批准号:TJFX08-050)
【分类号】：D923;D993

【相似文献】