当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

论WTO非违法之诉

发布时间:2018-05-11 10:42

  本文选题:非违法之诉 + 存在问题 ; 参考:《贵州民族大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:伴随着国际贸易的实践活动在国与国之间的展开,为了有效地保护各成员方利益的平衡,防止WTO成员方违反在贸易谈判中已达成的承诺,国际贸易的起草者设计出非违法之诉制度来维护成员方之间的贸易平衡。随着其担负的责任越来越重,WTO非违法之诉暴露的缺陷也越来越多。在规则方面,专家组对于“合理预期的利益”始终无法形成统一的解释,使得在非违法之诉中裁定“某一非违法措施是否造成了利益的丧失或损害”具有不同的评判标准。在管辖范围方面,,只要申诉方认为其利益受损就适用非违法之诉,使得非违法之诉案件的管辖权不断扩大,存在被滥用的风险。在实际可操作性方面,其对因果关系的举证显得较为复杂而困难,这增加了非违法之诉可操作性的难度。在国际贸易市场不断的发展下,中国面临着以美国为代表的西方列强试图通过非违法之诉来解决人民币汇率争端的问题,从WTO非违法之诉申诉方的主体、行为内容和举证责任角度,在非违法之诉内解决我国人民币汇率问题是不合法的,构建我国应对非违法之诉机制的体系显得十分有必要。
[Abstract]:With the practice of international trade between countries and countries, in order to effectively protect the balance of members of Fang Liyi and prevent WTO members from violating the commitments that have been reached in the trade negotiations, the drafters of international trade have designed a non illegal litigation system to maintain the trade balance between the members of Fang Zhi. In terms of rules, the expert group has always been unable to form a unified interpretation of "reasonably expected interests", making it possible to adjudication that "a non illegal measure has caused loss or damage to the interests of a non illegal measure" in a non illegal lawsuit. In the scope of the jurisdiction, the WTO has a different standard of judgment. As long as the complainant thinks that its interests are damaged, the non illegal action will be applied, which makes the jurisdiction of non illegal cases constantly expanding and the risk of being abused. In practical operability, the proof of the causal relation is more complicated and difficult, which increases the difficulty of the non illegal action. Under the development of China, the Western powers, represented by the United States, try to solve the issue of the RMB exchange rate dispute through non illegal action. From the perspective of the non illegal WTO complainant's main body, the behavior content and the burden of proof, it is illegal to solve the problem of the RMB exchange rate in the non illegal lawsuit. The system of the litigation mechanism is very necessary.

【学位授予单位】:贵州民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D996.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 左晓东;;WTO非违反之诉与竞争政策[J];财经问题研究;2009年05期

2 谢峥;世贸组织中的“不违法之诉”[J];国际商务.对外经济贸易大学学报;2004年02期

3 龚宇;“不违法之诉”与WTO争端解决机制[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2001年01期

4 杨国华;WTO第一个非违反之诉——日本消费胶卷和相纸案[J];法学杂志;2001年05期

5 王海峰;;WTO非违约之诉制度研究——兼论我国对非违约之诉机制的利用[J];国际贸易;2006年08期

6 易波;;WTO“利益”问题探析:非违法之诉视角[J];法学杂志;2012年12期

7 邓露;;浅议GATT/WTO体制下的“非违约之诉”[J];湖北警官学院学报;2012年05期

8 杨卫东;论WTO违法之诉中“抵消与损伤”推定的不可反证性[J];华北电力大学学报(社会科学版);2004年04期

9 袁勇;;合法预期利益之诉初论——以WTO非违法之诉为鉴[J];海南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2006年02期

10 孙连钟;刘秋东;;WTO争端解决机制中非违反之诉适用要件的分析[J];商场现代化;2007年25期



本文编号:1873618

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1873618.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户70795***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com