知识产权反垄断豁免问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-14 20:35

本文选题：知识产权 + 反垄断法　；参考：《中南大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：知识产权作为一项合法垄断权,在市场竞争中有重要作用,其同规制竞争的反垄断法有千丝万缕的关系,处理好在两者交叉领域产生的知识产权反垄断豁免问题对保护知识产权与维护竞争秩序都具有重要意义。以美欧为代表的国家知识产权反垄断豁免制度发展较早,国际统一反垄断规则中也有相关规定,对其进行比较研究,认识其中存在问题,对完善我国知识产权反垄断豁免问题解决机制有借鉴意义。反垄断法因知识产权的特殊性,以及两者对社会整体利益、总体公平与效率的共同追求而给予知识产权以豁免,但又由于反垄断法与知识产权之间固然存在的冲突可能性而对这种豁免加以限制,防止不正当行使知识产权可能产生反竞争效果,知识产权反垄断豁免问题由此产生。为解决这个问题,国际统一反垄断法以及各国家和地区的反垄断法及其适用规则都进行了探索,而将反垄断法统一适用于含知识产权在内的一国所有经济领域,然后根据社会公共利益、公平效率的考虑对知识产权正当行使实施豁免的模式渐趋被广泛接受,得到美欧日等多数国家的采用。在我国对知识产权反垄断豁免问题的处理方面,2008年出台的《反垄断法》第55条使我国知识产权反垄断问题的处理终于摆脱了无专门法律条文的尴尬处境,但此条文原则性过强,缺乏具体操作性。未来对我国知识产权反垄断豁免问题处理机制的完善应该以丰富《反垄断法》第55条为中心,解决好我国作为发展中国家利用知识产权政策维护本国利益的立场问题、继续有限制的加强知识产权保护的同时,发展第55条的内涵与外延,丰富条文内容的基础上配置具体操作指南以增强我国知识产权反垄断豁免问题解决机制的实效。具体措施应包含确立“统一使用,例外豁免”的模式、设立专门主管机构等,同时还应在内容与形式方面都与国际统一反垄断规则相接轨,参与到规则的制定中维护本国利益。
[Abstract]:As a legal monopoly right, intellectual property rights play an important role in market competition. It is of great significance to protect intellectual property rights and maintain competition order to deal with the problem of antitrust immunity of intellectual property right in the two intersecting fields. The anti-monopoly exemption system of intellectual property rights of the countries represented by the United States and Europe developed earlier. There are also relevant provisions in the international uniform anti-monopoly rules. It can be used for reference to improve the anti-monopoly exemption mechanism of intellectual property rights in China. Due to the particularity of intellectual property rights and the common pursuit of the interests of the whole society, the overall fairness and efficiency, the anti-monopoly law has granted immunity to intellectual property rights. However, due to the possibility of conflict between anti-monopoly law and intellectual property, the immunity is restricted to prevent the improper exercise of intellectual property, which may have anti-competitive effect, and the issue of anti-monopoly immunity of intellectual property. In order to solve this problem, the international unified anti-monopoly law, the anti-monopoly law of various countries and regions and its applicable rules have been explored, and the anti-monopoly law has been applied to all economic fields of a country including intellectual property rights. Then according to the social public interest, the fair efficiency consideration to the intellectual property right proper exercise immunity pattern gradually is widely accepted, has been adopted by the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries. In the aspect of dealing with the issue of anti-monopoly exemption of intellectual property rights in our country, Article 55 of the Anti-monopoly Law issued in 2008 has finally got rid of the embarrassing situation that there are no special legal provisions on the issue of anti-monopoly of intellectual property rights in China, but this provision is too principled. Lack of concrete operation. In the future, the improvement of the mechanism to deal with the issue of anti-monopoly exemption of intellectual property rights in China should focus on enriching Article 55 of the Anti-monopoly Law to solve the problem of our country's position of using intellectual property policies to safeguard its own interests as a developing country. While we continue to strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, we should develop the connotation and extension of Article 55 and configure specific operating guidelines on the basis of enriching the contents of the articles in order to enhance the effectiveness of the mechanism for solving the problem of anti-monopoly immunity of intellectual property rights in China. The concrete measures should include establishing the mode of "uniform use, exceptional exemption", establishing special competent agencies, and so on. At the same time, the concrete measures should be in line with international uniform antitrust rules in content and form, and participate in the formulation of rules to safeguard the interests of their own countries.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1;D922.294

【参考文献】