传统文化知识产权国际保护立法问题初探

发布时间：2018-05-15 02:02

本文选题：传统文化的国际保护 + 知识产权立法　；参考：《哈尔滨工程大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：传统文化是人类文化重要的组成部分，体现了一个民族乃至一个国家独特的文化特征。然而在国际范围内，尚未建立传统文化的知识产权保护机制，传统文化知识产权保护意识的薄弱，以及法律机制的缺失，导致一国的文化遗产遭到其他国家的不适当利用与滥用。基于此，，本文在梳理立法问题的同时，提出了传统文化知识产权的利益平衡机制以及国内立法与国际立法问题。发达国家与发展中国家，传统文化的来源地与其他地区，传统文化传承人与改编者、使用者的利益失衡问题亟待解决，传统文化的来源地以及传统文化创作传承人应积极谋求利益平衡机制，以维护传统文化来源地与传承人的精神利益与经济利益。同时，在立法时应注意国内法与国际法的衔接，如何平衡传统文化知识产权的国际保护与国内保护之间的关系，也是制定传统文化法律保护机制的重点之一。这也是建立良好的传统文化国际保护制度的前提。对于传统文化知识产权国际保护的立法重构，本文确定了与传统文化知识产权相关的基本概念，并建议在立法保护方面，应实行私权与公权相结合的立法机制，一方面在知识产权领域内对传统文化进行保护，另一方面对传统文化的文化权利进行保护。本文提出了运用国际条约中的弹性条款对传统文化进行保护，以TRIPs为例。由于TRIPs协议中并未加入对于传统文化的知识产权保护，因此只有从弹性条款中找到与之相联系的条款并加以运用。以我国为代表的发展中国家应当灵活运用TRIPs协议中的弹性条款来完善传统文化知识产权的立法机制，以维护本国利益。一方面，应该充分理解把握TRIPs协议中的弹性条款，另一方面应积极参与TRIPs协议多边谈判。
[Abstract]:Traditional culture is an important part of human culture, which embodies the unique cultural characteristics of a nation or even a country. However, in the international scope, the intellectual property protection mechanism of traditional culture has not been established, the consciousness of intellectual property protection of traditional culture is weak, and the lack of legal mechanism. As a result, the cultural heritage of one country is improperly exploited and abused by other countries. Based on this, this paper puts forward the interests balance mechanism of traditional cultural intellectual property rights and domestic and international legislation while combing the legislative issues. The interests of developed and developing countries, the origin and other regions of traditional culture, the imbalanced interests of traditional cultural inheritors and editors and users should be solved urgently. The origin of traditional culture and the inheritor of traditional culture creation should actively seek the mechanism of balancing interests in order to maintain the origin of traditional culture and the spiritual and economic interests of inheritors. At the same time, attention should be paid to the connection between domestic law and international law, and how to balance the relationship between the international and domestic protection of intellectual property rights of traditional culture is one of the key points in formulating the legal protection mechanism of traditional culture. This is also the premise of establishing a good international protection system of traditional culture. For the legislative reconstruction of the international protection of traditional cultural intellectual property rights, this paper defines the basic concepts related to the intellectual property rights of traditional culture, and suggests that the legislative mechanism of combining private and public rights should be implemented in the aspect of legislative protection. On the one hand, protect the traditional culture in the field of intellectual property, on the other hand, protect the cultural rights of the traditional culture. In this paper, the flexible clause in international treaties is proposed to protect traditional culture, taking TRIPs as an example. Because the intellectual property protection of traditional culture has not been added to the TRIPs agreement, it is necessary to find and apply the related clauses from the flexible clause. The developing countries represented by China should flexibly use the flexible clauses in the TRIPs Agreement to perfect the legislative mechanism of traditional cultural intellectual property rights in order to safeguard their own interests. On the one hand, we should fully understand and grasp the flexible clauses in the TRIPs agreement, on the other hand, we should actively participate in the multilateral negotiation of the TRIPs protocol.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工程大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D997.1

【参考文献】