暗香浮动:双重反致的伦理密码

发布时间：2018-05-15 03:05

本文选题：冲突法 + 判决一致　；参考：《法制与社会发展》2012年01期

【摘要】：追求判决一致是冲突法的古典抱负,传统反致之创设即服务于此一功效。拉塞尔开创双重反致先例之时并未释明其动机与理由。两种正相反对的解释路向彼此既不能证伪复又和谐兼容于双重反致,这表明应从第三维度即回归冲突法寻求判决一致之古典使命来解读其伦理取向。双重反致的生命力在于其能够为只能实现判决相对一致的传统反致所不能担保的判决绝对一致之目标提供绝对保证,精确致达冲突法之意向。判决一致本身不体现伦理深度,其实现方式才体现伦理深度。传统反致的相对性在于他律,双重反致的绝对性则得益于自律。立足于自律之上的双重反致移情换位于外国法院之立场,散发出为他人的伦理暗香。为他人的脆弱性及其可能走向的为难他人的背反结局使其危机再现。对我意识的终极溯源揭示了他人就是上帝的本体论结构,逃脱上帝的不可能性是对为他人伦理及作为其技术表达的双重反致之伦理困境及伦理密码的辩证破解。
[Abstract]:The pursuit of consistent judgment is the classical aspiration of conflict law, which is served by the creation of traditional reflexive. Russell did not explain his motives and reasons when he set the precedent of double reaction. The two opposite directions of interpretation can not be verified and are compatible with dual reflexive, which indicates that the ethical orientation should be interpreted from the third dimension, that is, the classical mission of regression to conflict of laws. The vitality of double reflexive lies in its ability to provide absolute guarantee for the objective of absolute agreement which can only be guaranteed by traditional reflexive which can only realize the relative consistency of judgment, and to accurately reach the intention of conflict of laws. Judgment consensus itself does not reflect ethical depth, but its realization mode reflects ethical depth. The relativity of traditional reflexive lies in heteronomy, and the absoluteness of double reflexive is due to self-discipline. The dual reflexive empathy based on self-discipline in foreign courts emits the ethical scent of others. The crisis reappeared because of the vulnerability of others and the possible back-to-back outcome of others. The ultimate traceability of my consciousness reveals the ontological structure that others are God, and escaping the impossibility of God is a dialectical interpretation of the ethical dilemma and ethical code of double reaction for others' ethics and their technical expression.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E6%9C%BA%E5%88%B6%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E2%80%9D(11YJC820161)" target="_blank">教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“<涉外民事关系法律适用法>实施机制研究”(11YJC820161) 重庆市首批高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划“冲突法的可能性研究”
【分类号】：D997

【共引文献】