当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

非市场经济规则下欧盟对华反倾销问题研究

发布时间:2018-05-17 06:07

  本文选题:反倾销 + 非市场经济规则 ; 参考:《西北大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:非市场经济规则是反倾销法中的一项特殊的规则,用以确定来自非市场经济国家产品的倾销幅度及反倾销税。各成员国对华适用非市场经济规则的主要依据是中国在入世时在《入世议定书》中做出的承诺,即其他成员国在入世后15年内可视中国为非市场经济国家。虽然中国是欧盟最紧密的贸易合作伙伴之一,但中欧之间的贸易摩擦也频频发生。在欧盟对华发起的反倾销调查中,调查当局通常将我国视为非市场经济国家,并适用非市场经济规则,仅给予少数满足相应条件的中国企业以市场经济地位或分别裁决待遇,这使得我国出口企业遭受巨大损失。冰冻三尺非一日之寒,我们应该认识到,要欧盟放弃对在华反倾销中适用的非市场经济规则,并非能在短时间内彻底解决的问题。 本文正文包括五章。第一章对非市场经济规则做了简要介绍,并从宏观角度分析了欧盟非市场经济规则对中国所产生的影响。第二章介绍了非市场经济规则中的替代国规则,包括替代国选择及依据替代国规则计算正常价值的方法、个别审查问题以及替代国规则的具体影响。第三部份阐述了另一具体的市场经济规则——一国一税规则,对其合理性提出质疑,详述其对我国的影响。第四部分主要论证的是非市场经济规则下欧盟反倾销的救济问题,分别阐述了我国企业由于非市场经济规则而在欧盟反倾销各行政复审中所遇到的阻碍,并通过案例分析非市场经济规则下中国企业在欧盟反倾销司法审查中的不利地位。第五部分分别从政府和企业两方面就欧盟非市场经济规则的具体规则提出应对之策:政府应发挥其行政职能,争取中国企业在应对欧盟反倾销时的合理待遇;企业应完善自身的管理,预防并积极应对欧盟的反倾销调查。另外,该部分还就行政复审和司法审查的可行性和具体操作提出笔者看法。
[Abstract]:Non-market economy rule is a special rule in anti-dumping law to determine the dumping margin and anti-dumping duty of products from non-market economy countries. The main basis for the application of non-market economic rules to China by all member countries is the promise made by China in the Protocol of accession to the WTO, that is, other member countries may regard China as a non-market economy country within 15 years after China's accession to the WTO. Although China is one of the EU's closest trading partners, trade frictions between China and Europe are also frequent. In the anti-dumping investigation initiated by the European Union against China, the investigating authorities usually regard China as a non-market economy country and apply the non-market economy rules, and only a few Chinese enterprises meeting the corresponding conditions are given market economy status or separately adjudicated treatment. This makes our export enterprises suffer huge losses. Since it is not a day before the ice freezes, we should realize that it is not a problem that can be solved completely in a short period of time if the EU should abandon the non-market economic rules applicable in anti-dumping against China. The text of this paper includes five chapters. The first chapter gives a brief introduction to the rules of non-market economy, and analyzes the influence of the rules of non-market economy of EU on China from the macro point of view. The second chapter introduces the surrogate country rule in the non-market economy rule, including the method of selecting the surrogate country and calculating the normal value according to the surrogate country rule, the individual examination problem and the concrete influence of the surrogate country rule. The third part expounds another specific market economy rule-one country, one tax rule, questions its rationality, and details its influence on our country. The fourth part mainly discusses the relief of EU anti-dumping under the non-market economy rules, and expounds the obstacles encountered by Chinese enterprises in the EU anti-dumping administrative review because of the non-market economy rules. It also analyzes the unfavorable position of Chinese enterprises in EU anti-dumping judicial review under the rules of non-market economy. In the fifth part, the author puts forward some countermeasures on the specific rules of EU non-market economy from the government and enterprises: the government should give full play to its administrative function and strive for the reasonable treatment of Chinese enterprises when dealing with EU anti-dumping; Enterprises should improve their own management, prevent and actively respond to EU anti-dumping investigations. In addition, this part also puts forward the author's opinion on the feasibility and concrete operation of administrative review and judicial review.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张新娟;;欧盟反倾销法非市场经济规则研究[J];法学家;2003年06期

2 江鸿;;反倾销中的替代国制度及我国的应对措施[J];法制与社会;2011年21期

3 王晓非;评欧盟反倾销法及实践中替代国方法的消极性[J];国际贸易问题;2003年08期

4 蔡庆辉;欧盟对华钼铁反倾销案研究[J];国际贸易问题;2005年04期

5 刘军;从一国一税制谈中国应对反倾销的策略[J];国际经济评论;2004年04期

6 马海涛;李小玲;;欧盟对华反倾销司法审查中的非市场经济问题探析[J];公民与法(法学);2011年01期

7 李涛;;反倾销调查中“单独税率”问题分析[J];东方企业文化;2011年02期

8 陈立鹏;;第九回 为分别税率而战[J];大经贸;2006年09期

9 王秀玲;欧共体对我国反倾销措施中的分别裁决问题[J];河北法学;2004年08期

10 回颖;;中欧关于“市场经济地位”问题之争的法律分析[J];河北工程大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 韩晓委;欧洲法院反倾销判例研究:中国视角[D];北京大学;2005年



本文编号:1900226

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1900226.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户703ae***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com