国家公共秩序还是国际公共秩序——服务贸易总协定中公共秩序的定位

发布时间：2018-05-20 01:17

本文选题：服务贸易 + 公共秩序　；参考：《国际经贸探索》2012年10期

【摘要】：各国服务贸易发展不平衡与国际服务贸易自由化的矛盾使《服务贸易总协定》的公共秩序例外制度成为重要的"缓冲地带"。具有贸易限制效应的争议措施意欲保护的公共秩序的范围认定就成为必须解决的关键问题。WTO司法实践认定为国际社会的公共秩序,而有学者认为是贸易限制措施实施国一国的公共秩序。进一步的研究发现WTO文本规定、相关欧盟司法实践、演进式解释历史等WTO法律解释因素和立法交易成本、国际贸易自行车理论、法官最大化自身利益的理性选择等经济政治因素共同决定国际公共秩序观点更具法理依据,也更合理。但是,国际公共秩序观点的确存在过度压缩成员自治权空间的弊端,有必要对其进行一定程度的软化。
[Abstract]:The contradiction between the unbalanced development of trade in services and the liberalization of international trade in services makes the exception system of public order in GATS an important "buffer zone". The determination of the scope of public order, which is intended to be protected by the controversial measures with the effect of trade restriction, has become the key problem that must be solved. The judicial practice of WTO is regarded as the public order of the international community. Some scholars think it is the public order of a country in which trade restriction measures are implemented. Further studies have found that the WTO text stipulates, relevant EU judicial practice, evolutional interpretation of history and other WTO legal interpretation factors and legislative transaction costs, international trade bicycle theory, The rational choice of judges' maximization of their own interests and other economic and political factors jointly determine the viewpoint of international public order, which has more legal basis and is more reasonable. However, the view of international public order does have the drawback of over-compressing the space of members' autonomy, so it is necessary to soften it to some extent.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学国际金融法律学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目(12CFX110) 上海市教委科研创新项目(13YS090) 华东政法大学2011年度校级科研项目“WTO案件申诉方胜诉率的实证研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】